If you were married to a rich man (millions), would you be a working-mother or stay-at-home mom?
2007-01-27 04:40:27 · 11 answers · asked by Charlotte Girl 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I am being honest here, I would be a working mother. I would insist on working to keep my independence. I have always worked and can not imagine not working. Working for me is not all about making money, but gives me a feeling of accomplishment and personal fulfillment. I would probably go from full time to part time, that way I could also fit some volunteer work in, I have always wanted to do volunteer work teaching people how to read. Also I would not want my husband to think I was only with him because he was rich, and to let him know I could take care of myself and be a financial help if he didn't have the money.
2007-01-27 04:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would still be a working mother. I'm the type of girl who likes to stay busy and useful and I couldn't stay at home taking care of kids all days. Besides it's been shown to actually cause a delay in a childs ability to devlop mentally and form relationships with other kids when their mom stays at home with them instead of sending them to daycare.
2007-01-27 04:49:22 · answer #2 · answered by prettyblueeyes101010 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I'd enjoy working either out of the house part time, as a hobby. Or working around the house, like in the garden.
2007-01-27 08:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by Tasha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly for me, i'm no longer married yet i'm engaged. My fiance isn't even close to to being wealthy. that's complicated because of the fact there's a great style of struggling with over costs, and money problems. have been constantly late on something, and its VERY complicated to get forward. yet we do love one yet another and take exhilaration in what we've greater then if we've been wealthy. maximum couples who're wealthy, in many situations appear like they have not got any dating different then money. They get each little thing they want, and characteristic each little thing and not in any respect take exhilaration in something or one yet another. additionally, if hes a employer guy or a physician he might not often ever be homestead, like being on call at a well being facility, which skill for the period of family time or dinner he might ought to bypass away. i could particularly be a bad couple or "center classification" then be wealthy. I take exhilaration in each little thing we've and him, greater then if each little thing became surpassed to me.
2016-11-27 22:21:59 · answer #4 · answered by leng 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt have kids I think I would have to have some kind of job though or I would be super bored all the time I think I would open a salon or something
2007-01-27 05:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stay at home mom. I always put my child first. I'm so glad I did. He is grown now and we are very close and he is a well adjusted productive adult.
2007-01-27 05:51:46 · answer #6 · answered by Just Me 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would stay at home but also do things like volunteer etc. so I would have my own things to do
2007-01-27 05:43:32 · answer #7 · answered by Shelby 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats a dumb question! i would be a stay at home mother!
2007-01-27 04:47:00 · answer #8 · answered by Amanda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would try to be successful doing both, get over that myth, cuz you'll be the first one to have everything pulled out from under you. Then what will you do???
2007-01-27 04:47:57 · answer #9 · answered by Skinz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would totally not work for pay, but would dediate my time and money to worthy causes.
2007-01-27 05:03:27 · answer #10 · answered by Kimberly H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋