Someone asked, would you vote for Hillary? Of the answers given to date. 37 No and 15 Yes. 18 women said No and 19 men said No. 12 women said Yes and 3 girlie boys said Yes. Interesting!
2007-01-27 04:38:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Well, Bush won't be running next year and has nothing to do with anything in this regard. Many Republicans have not sided with Bush. So, you there are several choices from either party. Hillary! Socialist with No integrity or honor. No morals. No pride. No experience or a decent track record in NY. Very divisive for the country. Makes a coyote shudder.
2007-01-27 04:58:09 · update #1
:)Simplif: This country is in great shape. Econ & employ r strong. Amers spending $ cause tax breaks. Deficit isn’t bad. Hlthcare & Soc Sec same shape under Bush as Clinton. Ignoring Iraq, this Admin has done exclt job repelling other disastrous terrorist attcks. It was not just the U.S. who suffered attks frm the Islamic terrorists. What about Bali, Spn, Engl & many others? It is not the Iraqi war – it’s Muslims who want to destroy us. Many Reps oppose Bush 4 Iraqi blunders. Hwvr, don’t see anything coming frm the Dems other than to attck B & win the WH next. Within the 1st svrl wks of new Congress, Dems were fighting 1 another. The only agree to attck Bush no matter what the cost. They offer nada. The Hse couldn’t pass the min wage cause Sen didn’t agree w/the lack tax breaks 4 business. Tell u 3 things Reps believe in, this great nation, God & morals. Dems r trying to remove God frm our schools & govt.
2007-01-28 03:50:38 · update #2
No, too much elitst and another replay of the Clinton years of the past.
2007-01-27 08:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by ram456456 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I would vote for her in a New York second. Considering our options. She knows more about this Government than any other person wanting to run for the pres.,
Tell me when this country has been in worst shape? It is about all of us. Throw the parties out the window, and look and see what they believe in. I'm tired of this war and it seems really useless. If we can drive without paying 3.00 per gallon and people are getting more than slave wages, and students receive more than $50.00 raise in six years, than hell yeah,,,,,,,,,,,, I'll vote for her. Regardless if your Dem or Rep don't you want to see this country a safer place to live? Each party has things that they stand for - guns, abortion, stem cell research, gay marriages. Each party has to stand for something. And each of us has to decide what we believe in as a citizen of this country. So it's everyone decision isn't it? I would rather not live in constant fear of another 9/11. This screwed war has to stop. We have a giant bulls eye on us and if you want that - well then vote for that. It's your right. But, as a country as a whole, I can not see where putting another Rep., in would do us any good. My views only....
2007-01-27 06:13:54 · answer #2 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What does it matter?
Elected officials, especially the President, have simply become figures who take the blame for policy while the people who are really behind the policy go without public scrutiny and continue to stay in Washington and create new policy.
In this way our presidential elections have given America a false sense of change, a sense of change that is really not taking place. All of the good and bad that Americans perceive about a political situation gets pinned on a president who simply comes and goes from office, while his policy makers are usually unaffected by public stigma.
2007-01-27 04:49:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The demographics fall in line with what I thought they would be. The femi-nazis and ****** vs the rest of the country. Frankly, I think she has already plateaued, and in politics you can't do that too soon or your dead in the water.
Already, the American people are tired of Hillary and soon will feel the same about Barack. They are both getting entirely too much publicity too early in the game. By the time the elections are here, they will both be also rans!
2007-01-27 04:57:29 · answer #4 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i'd not. If McCain needs my vote he will go with to %. someone like Dr. Condoleezza Rice for a operating mate. in the different case i'd be compelled to write down in a vote for "An previous Yellow canine".
2016-10-16 04:29:59 · answer #5 · answered by windy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for Hillary Clinton even if she was the only name on the ballot.
2007-01-27 04:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is not surprising, and refreshing to know that the vast majority of the American people are not brainwashed or deceived.
2007-01-27 04:42:42 · answer #7 · answered by Joe C 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Three little feminist girlie boys? I bet they talk with a San Francisco wussy accent, if you get my drift.
2007-01-27 04:43:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The deranged.
2007-01-27 04:52:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would, but only because if we get that Obama guy we'd be in real trouble.
2007-01-27 04:42:31 · answer #10 · answered by Jed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋