Rallies,public meetings,political and religious events which cause only inconvenience to common public.
Answers may be justified.
2007-01-27 04:23:30 · 7 answers · asked by binil b 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
A coin has always two sides.What is stated as obstacle for one group is appropriate remedy of the other group in a democratic polity.
The freedom is not actually meant for obstacles to any law full activity.But a country like India rallies,public meetings,political and religious events which cause only inconvenience to common public.are recognised it as a mean to achieve the desired results .I think it was Kerala State High Court that brought the much awaited restriction on such unflinching freedom.
A government which is inefficient or corrupt cannot deal with problems of this nature.When the authorities concerned ignore the legitimate grievance people will be forced to resort to such obstacles like road blocking picketing etc.
Only an enlightened society can bring the desired change in the attitude of politicians who have no consideration of the plight of the common man.
2007-01-27 05:34:24 · answer #1 · answered by Pkr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rallies are not good Neither the sound pollution is good. But
. Since very old times it has been happening,, in different style Eg:-Tipu Sutan
> 1. Both Hyder Ali and Tippu Sultan sent money to
> support the American
> Revolution
> 2. A 16 gun battleship was built using part of this
> money and named Hyder
> Ali
> 3. This battle ship defeated the English battle ship
> "Monk" in Delaware bay
> 4. A painting of the Hyder Ali is in the old library
> of Delaware University
> ( this is how I first discovered the connection)
> 5. Because of this timely support, , apart from the
> naval ship, the name
> Hyder Ali was commonly given to several entities
> during the American revolution
> (including new babies!)
> 6. Tippu Sultan was the first ruler from Asia to
> recognize the United States
.
2007-01-27 12:58:03 · answer #2 · answered by Maliha S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the freedom never we gained is to become an obstacle of cocitizen"s freedom.
2007-01-27 13:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by anubhav_55 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The freedom that we gained is to carry the co citizen with us and definitely not to create obstacle to him.
2007-01-27 19:29:40 · answer #4 · answered by senthil k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maturity in practising freedom is very important. Unfortunately we are not concentrating on maturity in practising freedom.
Civil disobedience to fight aganist British, had become our way of life. Like habbits die hard, we donot know that we need not practice civil disobedience aganist our own government. We do not relate ourselves with public property as our own property by understanding that public means it is we ourselves.
2007-01-27 22:53:00 · answer #5 · answered by manjunath s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you mean common public? If they can unite against this type of nuisances it will not happened. Instead of cursing the fate - beat them united.
2007-01-27 12:39:22 · answer #6 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
2007-01-27 12:37:01 · answer #7 · answered by ranganath gangannagmhalli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋