C
For B, even without the comma, it would be "The new drug proved to be highly effective it has no side effects." which is still improper. It's letter C because it needs something connecting the sentence ("The new drug proved to be highly effective AND it has no side effects.").
2007-01-27 04:29:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is B.
The sentence should read; The new drug proved to be highly effective. It has no side effects.
2007-01-27 04:27:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The new drug (NAME), has proved to be highly effective AND has no side effects.
2007-01-27 04:22:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by amethyst2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be grammicaly suitable, it will be :- Do you plan me to bypass to school; or ought to i'm getting a job..... yet employers and colleges those days do not look to agonize too a lot about suitable grammer or spelling. Doent wurie, slepe ezie
2016-10-16 04:29:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by windy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
PROVED suggests passed tense whereas HAS no side effects implies present tense .... so either change it to proves or to had
2007-01-27 04:29:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has a comma splice. It is two separate thoughts and should be two separate sentences.
2007-01-27 05:22:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rich Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly constructed sentence
2007-01-27 04:28:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Unhinged.... 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
b and c
if you are saying 'proved' past tense then i thing it would be correct to say it 'had' no side effects
2007-01-27 04:27:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by frogg135 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think it's B.
that comma shouldnt be there, it should be a semi colon.
2007-01-27 04:25:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by desirooo58 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the comma isnt right.
2007-01-27 04:22:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋