Which of these cities is the most polluted and dirtiest in appearance? Which is the ugliest?
2007-01-27 02:51:32 · 7 answers · asked by Jumpin' Jack Flash 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Other - United States
Yeah, I'm going to have to go with Elizabeth NJ for the most polluted looking. I haven't seen Flint or Youngstown, but I am sure they are no match for the industrial wasteland that is Elizabeth. I don't know about ugliest; I actually find the ambiance of Elizabeth beautiful in a sort of disturbing way, maybe like an H.R. Giger painting. Camden is defiantly the most crime-ridden. It is a different kind of hell-hole. The aquarium is kind of cool though...
2007-01-27 03:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by That Guy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe LosAngles is the ugliest. Drive around the south side and see for yourself. I know its meaner than any of those and those buildings there are uglier too. .
2007-01-27 02:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by James M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know which is the dirtest or the ugliest but I am from Ohio. I have been to Toledo and I hated it there.
2007-01-27 02:58:37 · answer #3 · answered by Nancy M. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elizabeth. I'd pick Camden if by "most polluted" you meant "where am I most likely to be robbed/raped/murdered".
2007-01-27 02:58:30 · answer #4 · answered by Pitt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say Amarillo, TX is pretty close to Flint, MI.
2007-01-27 09:12:26 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eliz. NJ gets my vote
2007-01-27 02:55:16 · answer #6 · answered by loligo1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
elizabeth nj
2007-01-27 02:59:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋