how can a judge say "i dont believe you"?

Question

Hi I was wondering, I have been watching some judge shows during the day and I have noticed judges often say, "I don't believe you" Once I went to a legal mediator. These two bullies from my work didn't like me much and actually hated me to the extent they went to court to have my unemployment revoked. Even though I had evidence I was fired wrongly, the mediator said those words, "I don't believe you." I am perplexed that anyone has the right to say that, esp if they do not know. Do they have a lie detector test telling them who is telling the truth? What if they are wrong? It makes me sad to think the legal system is based on presumptions? I feel like they should say something like, "Based on the evidence, I can only conclude blah blah..." To say they don't believe something sounds wrong to me, esp in my case the mediator couldn't have been more wrong. It really made me lose faith in the legal system. And to see it on judge shows makes me almost cringe. What do you think? Thank you.

cuban fiend, i think your attitude is dangerous. your use of language is provoking and accusatory. i suggest if you and your wife are so burnt out, perhaps you should find different jobs. because your jobs are about justice. its one thing to mistakenly rule against an innocent person, but to make an excuse for it because you have seen so many liars and jokers in your life-- that is indicative of your anger. i think you need help and you should look into it. youre burnt out. i used to work in social work, so i have seen my fair share of things too. as a social worker i can see burnt out pretty clearly. no hard feelings. well thanks for giving me you pov at any rate. take care and peace.

Answer 1

First, don't put too much weight into anything you see on television. Even the courtroom shows are just that: shows, intended to be entertaining and capture an audience to achieve ratings.

However, I agree with your perspective, especially where authority figures are concerned. A judge or mediator, who are supposed to be objective, should not be offering opinions or input while a case is being presented. It's unprofessional and unfair to the opposing side. Their role is to listen to the evidence and arguments presented, evaluate their merit, and rule based on what they've heard.

Unfortunately, even if a judge or mediator's outward behavior is appropriate, that doesn't necessarily mean s/he's not thinking, "I don't believe you." In that vein, perhaps they're doing you a favor by telling you so upfront, allowing you an opportunity to address their doubt.

Answer 2

Judges come in different courts. It depends on what court you are in. There are many courts without juries and any Judge who sees enough crap and is asked to make a decision based on the partial truths told by each side has to be able to determine which side is the closest to the actual truth. In case you don't know it, people lie sometimes. My wife is a judge and she hears lies all day long from rednecks, criminals, child molesters and god knows what else and she has to determine what the truth is if at all possible, as well as determine if these poor people should be let back out onto society as a whole
Before you make rude decisions as to what a judge should do, try sitting in and ordinance court or a first appearance court and just listen to the lies and you will be able to understand how a judge can say I don't believe you
Multiply your experience by 4 years per term and you will see how they become pretty good at detecting lies and partial truths. If you do this and still have a question, Then you should re-post it and tell us all how it should be done
BTW mediators are not judges! Did you find out if he/she /it had a conflict of interest? There was a mediator in Georgia who was a former partner of one of the attorneys in a case who settled in favor of his old friend's side and has been recently been taken to task for it and the settlement was challenged successfully

Answer 3

Judges assess the believability of witnesses based on the quality of the evidence in light of other evidence and the manner in which evidence is presented. If a judge were to say that in front of a jury, then probably one could get a mistrial as when a jury is present, judges are not deciders of fact.

Answer 4

If there became no evil or devil, then why did Jesus die? all of us are sinners. we at the instant are not stable people. Jesus loves us lots that He died on the bypass for our sins. those which will have faith will bypass to heaven. those that may not have faith will bypass to hell, the region the place devil is. Jesus conquered devil while He died on the bypass. in case you suspect in Christ you will bypass to heaven. If there is not any evil, why are there criminals? that's a regulation. it is not correct whether you suspect it or no longer, it remains appropriate. Take the regulation of gravity, case in point. If i do no longer think in gravity, does that advise it is not genuine? Does that advise i do no longer ought to pay for the implications of my strikes? No, It basically skill that if I leap out the window, I won't fly like i could anticipate to, yet i could harm my neck and die. comparable right here. in case you do no longer have faith in God, devil, or evil, that would not advise it is not there or it is not appropriate to you. It basically skill that that's gonna hit you exceedingly complicated. And have faith me, it ain't gonna be exceedingly. look, Jesus cares. (John 3:sixteen). could you resign to Him today?