I believe the prosecutors will do everything possible to make sure it doesn't do anything good for the Bush Administration. That is the template for the times we live in.
This whole thing is a circus, and if that isn't the main point brought out at these proceedings I will be disappointed in our system.
Although it's already been said to death, there was no identity leak, and even if there was, Scooter didn't do it. It is so absurd as to be laughable, that someone could be charged with perjury for not being able to remember the circumstances of a non-issue!
And we won't even go over the issue of double standards with the Sandy Berger mess.
Whatever.
2007-01-27 02:39:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Linea 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Its a perjury trial. They claim he lied under oath...and not about Valerie Plume. Half of washington knew who she was and what she did. The source was someone outside of the bush circle... and he didnt even know he was the "leak" until two years AFTER the story came out.
Scooter won't even be convicted. I know thw facts of this case aren't mentioned much by any news channel but if you read the case and the investgation notes you would know this already.
2007-01-27 02:38:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mazlow01 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
in case you do no longer like it, why did you watch no longer basically one, yet 2 shows? Is it *incredibly* that significant to you that their insurance (I heard a sprint, yet wasn't paying interest) meet your standards? actuality: CNN chief information govt resigned after making rather beside the point comments approximately our infantrymen in Iraq. Hmm - it may no longer be a LIBERAL BIAS, now would desire to it? actuality: CBS and Dan incredibly enable their hatred of Bush override their judgment and went with the fake memo tale. Gee - those conservatives interior the media incredibly have been given Dan, did no longer they? actuality: l. a. circumstances revealed a doctored up image that made British infantrymen look very undesirable. yet, gee - there isn't any liberal bias to the media. actuality: Retuers lost a photographer final summer time after he became busted for Photoshopping photos taken in Lebanon of meant Israeli harm. Little trace right here, men - conservatives tend to help Israel. So the place's that conservative insurance we pay attention lots approximately?. actuality: the long island circumstances in no way got here across a countrywide secret they might not print. Plus, they saved Jayson Blair, understanding he became making his thoughts up, for a manner long? actuality: The Washington submit had a weblog submit those days that calls our troops "mercenaries" and means that they are all rapists and murderers. as though this weren't undesirable adequate, he inferred that the troops could be satisfied no person is spitting on them. it incredibly is maximum by utilising no ability a conservative fee. flow forward and provide me the thumbs-down. i do no longer likely care. My family contributors has an extremely long and proud custom with this united states, and my relatives have spilled blood on your top to take a seat domicile in very relative luxurious (do no longer think of so? you're on a working laptop or computing gadget, are not you? You needless to say are, and have internet get right of entry to - that ain't unfavorable. flow to Afghanistan or hell, even Mexico. it incredibly is unfavorable.) besides, that's the blood of my family contributors that has paid on your top to take a seat domicile and whinge. On their behalf, you're welcome.
2016-11-01 10:15:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it will reveal that Karl Rove was/is a backstabbing little poo stain; also, it will reveal Mr. Cheney is a vindictive martinet who thinks everyone should abide by the rules except him; finally, it will reveal that Scooter is going to take it between the back pockets for lying to the Grand Jury.
Unless the White House, throws Rove and Cheney in front of the bus, this story is going to drag on and on and will stink like Limburger on an engine block.
First off, the crime is dumb. No one should reveal the identity of CIA personnel. Especially just to discredit a guy. To Rove and Company, to have gotten a job because of your wife's connections somehow makes you less manly? What does that mean? They couldn't discredit Wilson's report in the NY Times so they call him p**sywhipped.
Wow, that's dumb. Couldn't they have come up with something better like, he eat boogers, or his mother wears combats boots, or anything else? P**sywhipped? At least Wilson is gettin' some.
As a Republican, a lifelong one at that, this whole thing smells bad.
Sorry to say, I am disappointed.
2007-01-27 03:04:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
It is a witch hunt started by the democrats. I hope it blows up in their face.
2007-01-27 02:41:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
He will probably die some mysterious death the day before he is scheduled to testify, .
2007-01-27 02:44:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's very clear that he's taking the hit for someone else.
2007-01-27 02:31:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
It is bad for America, just the way the liberals want it.
2007-01-27 02:31:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by 007 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
It's all a farce.
2007-01-27 02:34:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋