It appears that Libby is going to throw many of the Bush team under the bus and Cheney may get further implicated. This has some potential for some far reaching consequences.
2007-01-27 00:42:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Albert: I entirely agree. Let us see where Waxman's investigation into the Plame outing goes as well. He's not just gunning for perjury. We may have some real accountability here.
2007-01-27 00:57:44 · update #1
Answer man: Time for a big 'ole bag o popcorn.
This could be better than Watergate.
2007-01-27 00:59:18 · update #2
Suber: Apples and Oranges here. Someone in Bush's Admin OUTED an active CIA operative on the NOC list. This is treason, sir.
2007-01-27 01:04:02 · update #3
William: That is NOT what the CIA said in its complaint to the Justice Dept. and 2 question # 2 - as soon as he leaves office.
2007-01-27 01:26:17 · update #4
Such is politics! The administration expected Mr. Libby to bare the brundt of the scandal alone. Guess, Karl Rove never considered the eventual fall out. President Bush went into office promising to bring to justice all those dirty leakers. Then when he saw it beneficial to leak information against one of his critics, he acts like he doesn't know where the leak was generated. I think the charge of Treason should be applied here since this leak had the potential to endanger Ms. Plame or even those in other countries that had assisted her in her job as a C.I.A. operative.
2007-01-27 00:52:06 · answer #1 · answered by albert_noodles 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no person could even endure in innovations this present day 5 years from now. You lefty's caught somewhat fish for perjury. He lied decrease than oath, he merits the punishment. yet you're a great deal overestimating the importance of his conviction. you may nonetheless want evidence of incorrect doing by skill of those you want to "circulate after." There only isn't any. Sorry.
2016-09-28 01:30:36 · answer #2 · answered by schiraldi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The "outing" of Plame investigation will go nowhere, simply because she was not covert. The best Patrick Fitzgerald could do is try Libby on perjury, which will go nowhere.
Dude, how many different ways are you going to ask anti-Bush Administration questions?
2007-01-27 01:12:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think yes, much will come out on the inner workings of this criminal and corrupt administration that the public does not know. With an approval rating of 28% George Bush has little support as it is. As a side note I can hardly wait for Dead Eye Dick to testify and hope he is tripped up in one or more lies that he is bound to tell while he is under cross. "This is gonna get good."
2007-01-27 00:56:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree and I CAN'T wait to see that fat azz Cheney squirm in the witness chair. (of course, the reality is that he has no downside since his elite buddies will just pardon him if he gets into trouble). Great trial coverage on MSNBC, but if you're watching Hypocrit Bill O'Reilly, then you don't even know there is a trial...let alone how damaging it is to the administration...
2007-01-27 02:33:56 · answer #5 · answered by protocols 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it! Not when you have Sandy Burgler--excuse me, Berger having been caught stuffing highly classified documents into his pants at the US Justice Department and still walking around scott free today!!
2007-01-27 00:59:36 · answer #6 · answered by suburbandude 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Under the bus is a good start.
2007-01-27 00:46:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is this the same Libby whose scooter was stolen in Brooklyn?
2007-01-27 00:47:31 · answer #8 · answered by JiveSly 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The whole thing will leave egg on the prosecutors face, and no one will be hurt.
2007-01-27 00:49:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh...I certainly hope so!
2007-01-27 13:22:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋