2007-01-26 23:30:41 · 24 answers · asked by paulisfree2004 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He decides to divide.
2007-01-26 23:34:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well he has already claimed to be the "decider", so i guess that is what he is in his own mind.
If you want to call telling everyone it is his way or the highway to bring people together, then i guess you can't call him a divider, you can always make the other group the scapegoat on that one.
but if you call unity, representing the people, carrying out the will of the people, like a good elected official, and negotiating with other groups that were elected to send a direct message that the majority opposes your "deciding", then NO.... Bush is no "decider", he is a "divider"!
Bush-types always have a problem with check and balances, because they don't allow them to easily drop their faith based laws into place.
2007-01-27 01:36:42 · answer #2 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
President Bush can either be a decider or a divider because he can declare any invasion of a country that is deemed violating UN rules.
2007-01-27 00:18:24 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Divider in that he isn't accessible to most people.
The results of the 2000 election confound me.
Having lost the popular vote, it spells illegitimacy.
Maybe our election system is flawed.
Maybe it's time we have a president who gains overwhelming approval of the masses.
For the time being, he's just there, playing games with us, making speeches that are at times harsh, and then coming up with ideas which have been opponent's ideas from the past.
Six years wasted and counting.
We are in dire need for reformation of all kinds.
We need ideas from the masses as to how to cope with a world having crisis upon crisis, and our resources are being depleted when there are so many newer and better ways to achieve progress in a troubled world where many have lost hope.
Divider.
2007-01-26 23:45:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
people only won't be able to answer the question being asked, can they? besides here is my take: i do no longer unavoidably have self assurance Bush is inflicting it, yet he's via no skill helping. by way of fact of his singular concentration on Iraq and Saddam in specific, he has disregarded each and every thing else. on the initiating of his adminstration, he disregarded the communicate of any conservation of gas utilization. Now while the situation contains bear, he's all approximately conservation. Invading Iraq is the main mistake concerning to distant places affairs an US president can ever made. Now Iraq is a hopeless mess. The hostilities between Shi'tes and Sunnis are in no far greater severe. middle East is close to to all out interior sight war on the same time as Bush remains refusing all out diplomatic efforts ( with concerning to Iran, guess what, US wanted to help Iran to construct nuclear vegetation a pair an prolonged time back, even though it did no longer pan out due of loss of political will, the ironies only in no way ends). Bush is probably no longer inflicting oil expenses to run extreme, yet all of what he does seem to make the subject worse. The gas fee will proceed to circulate extreme till it extremely is extreme sufficient for individuals to alter their using behavior. like it replaced into mentioned, it extremely is all approximately grant and insist. XR
2016-12-16 14:45:28 · answer #5 · answered by holness 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our president has worked pretty hard at bringing democrats and republicans together.
The democrats in Congress and the media are the dividers. I've watched the way they do business. They tune in to Bush's speaches no matter where he is anywhere in the country. Minutes after his speach is over, they have a response ready to go. I've seen Harry Reid out on the steps of the Capital bldg more times than I can count with a ready-made press conference and response in hand denegrading everything the president said.
Democrats have become bickering, devicive partisan robots. Watch them. No matter what the president says, they'll stand up and say the opposite, even if it makes them sound like idiots.
Do you remember when Bush was saying about Iraq "stay the course" and democrats fought back with "redeployment"?
Now Bush is saying "surge 20,000" and democrats are saying "no, just leave it the way it is" (translation: "stay the course"). What a bunch of dopes!
2007-01-26 23:47:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush is divider .He is divider of the American society .Divider of Iraq.Divider of the world to either with him or against him !
2007-01-27 01:30:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He sure has divided America with his Administration. America wants change that Bush fails to provide. The Bush sheep have called Americans terrorist long enough, and should be reprimanded severely for their actions. I don't believe that the Fascist regime took hold like they wanted it too.
2007-01-26 23:51:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He has divided this country, more then any other politician since Lyndon Johnson. War has a way of doing that and especially an unwanted war. He has caused this country great strife, there is a war protest today in Washington and I have not seen anything like it since the 70's.
2007-01-26 23:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
As I recall, Curious George went on national television to inform us and the rest of the world that "You are either with us or against us."
I'd say that's about as devisive as you can get. "My way or the high way..."
He had the chance, on 9/11, to go down in history as one of the greatest presidents of the modern age. Instead, Wolfowitz, Perle, and the other neo-conmen sold him a bill of goods called Iraq. He "decided" to take their advice.
Where are the neo-conmen now, by the way?
2007-01-27 00:07:49 · answer #10 · answered by normanbormann 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋