Yes I think he would.
Do you ever wonder how a President Gore would have reacted to 9/11? I think he would have gone after bin Laden in Afghanistan but then instead of declaring an absurd "war on global terrorism" he might have declared a "war for energy independence". Instead of spending billion in Iraq, he might have rallied the nation to move towards alternative clean energies and conservation so we could free our addiction to oil and not get bogged down in the crazy middle east all the time.
For a few hundred ballots in Palm Beach County, FL, there changes history...
2007-01-26 23:18:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Oh - there is purely lots lack of understanding right here that's perplexing to comprehend the place to commence. a million. There might nonetheless be worldwide warming - yet there would not be the U. S. intentionally undermining worldwide tries to confirm it. 2. Al Gore already has a company promoting carbon credit. He buys carbon credit for his very own jet trip and electrical energy utilization. 3. Al Gore has in no way claimed to have invented something. 4. Canada's staggering earnings tax point is 29% federal tax and 17.80 4% for the staggering provincial value. subsequently the utmost marginal value may well be basically 40 six.80 4% 5. Canada's entire (government plus inner maximum) conventional fee for wellness care is purely over 0.5 what that's interior the U. S. and that they nonetheless get a extra appropriate wellness equipment than we do.
2016-11-01 10:01:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a chance. He was a staunch supporter of the worst, most useless, and most destructive attack on the rights of American citizens in the history of the United States by supporting Slick Willy's absurd gun ban when he was president. According to the national statistics posted by the FBI annually, this piece of utterly useless "feel good" legislation did absolutely nothing to deter crime. He's also a typical "tax and spend" Democrat, and I'll never vote for anyone - regardless of their party affiliation - who supports either of these moronic ideals.
Sure, he's smart - his recent work on global warming proves that - but he's also a crybaby and a sore loser.
Nope. Bucky the Dancing Mule is looking better and better.
2007-01-26 23:26:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Team Chief 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
President of what? The local chamber of commerce? The local chapter of Village Idiots? Al Gore would make a terrible president of the US.
2007-01-26 23:12:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by pretender59321 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
No I don't. I don't know where you get the idea that he is smart. Every time I hear his speak, I think he sounds dumb. It might be his stiff delivery or whatever, but intelligent does not seem to come across when I listen to him.
2007-01-26 23:10:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
he's ambitious all right. I don't like his tactic and sources for funding. (Chinese) He is also not even as nice as Hillary and she is a mean witch. He is not a very nice man. He is all camera smiles. He brings nothing to the table.
2007-01-26 23:27:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Not my cup of tea. I'll keep looking for my candidate. Nor do the four adjectives you've used necessarily describe what I'm looking for.
2007-01-26 23:19:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course he would...He invented the internet after all!!
2007-01-26 23:07:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Golfer 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nope, next question.
2007-01-26 23:57:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, No and I repeat No!
2007-01-27 17:19:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by sweetpeasmum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋