2007-01-26 21:37:34 · 10 answers · asked by ibrahim a 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I assume you are using a translator of some sort, so I'm not going to criticize your grammar.
Yes, Israel should be allowed to exist.
Israel has a right to exist, as did Palestine. Unfortunately for Palestine, they attacked Israel as soon as they were granted independence.
So, the Palestinians learned a lesson the hard way. Don't attack Israel.
2007-01-26 21:49:02 · answer #1 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
And who is going to stop them from existing? The Arabs? They cannot live with one another so pulling them all together for a war against Israel is not probable. They will fight among themselves, as they are doing now, and they will wipe each other out. This has been going on for centuries so why would it stop now? I am not saying that an Arab threat isn't real but Israel with the aid of the USA can take care of itself.
2007-01-27 06:10:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Certainly they are allowed to exist. But Israel is also accountable for it's actions. The nation cannot over react to any and all provocation and be justified in it. If they want real peace in the region they will reach out with an open hand, not a closed fist.
2007-01-27 05:55:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
OK then, let's nuke israel so that there will be no more israelites to make another nation.
You could substitute all other nations as well. Is palestine allowable to exist? egypt? iran? iraq? france? germany? US?
Is the existence of one nation even debatable? NO. the issue with Israel and palestine should not be whether israel is allowable to exist, but on how the current situation is to be resolved for everyone to co-exist peacefully with its neighbors. It should not be on how to exterminate the other... from a palestinian's point of view, that is.
2007-01-27 05:55:04 · answer #4 · answered by bulimpact 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the issue now is if it's "allowable". I don't agree with the methods by which is was initiated (unfair, unjust and dishonest) but at this point in time , you can't expect to eradicate an established country with 7 million + individuals living in it. I don't agree with it's government's tactics about 90% of the time but I don't think it's rational that all the ppl living there should be held responsible for that.
The main issue now is how to enable the palestinians and israelis to co-exist without them killing each other, particularly because of the deplorable conditions the palestinians are living in now.
Any human losses, of any creed or nationality are a tragedy and we have to keep that in mind when pondering questions like this one.
2007-01-27 05:46:41 · answer #5 · answered by crystal_fire_18 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The State of Israel has flourished in its current location since the Establishment of the State of Israel was the official announcement that a new Jewish state, named the State of Israel (Medinat Yisrael in Hebrew), had been formally established in the British Mandate of Palestine, the land where the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah once have been.
It has been called the start of the "Third Jewish Commonwealth" by some observers. The "First Jewish Commonwealth" ended with the destruction of Solomon's Temple, and the second with the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem two thousand years ago.
(You and i are not fit, not worthy to disallow anything that is the work of the Almighty.)
2007-01-27 05:48:29 · answer #6 · answered by erlish 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What do you think?
As far as the current situation is concerned, Israel should go back to the 1967 borders, in exchange for recognition from the Arab and Muslim states (Israel rejected that so far).
Didn't you see what's going on in Israel right now? Its a divided state. I guess Olmert should have seriously thought hard before attacking Lebanon.
2007-01-27 05:45:35 · answer #7 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1 might as well ask if the arabcountries should be allowed exist. They invented the digit 0. Thats about what they have contributed to the world :0
2007-01-27 09:52:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The UN created it, the UN says it breaks UN law, go figure.
2007-01-27 05:47:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There WAS a UN declaration that made it official.
2007-01-27 06:10:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋