English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is the bbc biased against white people in its reporting of racist murders compare coverage of kriss donald murder in scotland to coverage of murder of antony walker for example, among many others,and should we be paying for this.No racist murders are justified but should all be covered equally ,I object to paying for a licence for this tripe masquerading as a news channel.

2007-01-26 20:50:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

12 answers

So you are saying that it shouldn't had been covered at all?
Regardless of the colour of the skin, a man lost his life and all you can think about is your licence fee.

2007-01-26 21:04:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

you're right, there is an agenda here which the BBC is promoting, i.e. the submission of indigineous Engish and the erosion of national pride. I have seen many examples of black v. white crime .... never racist. There was an unpleasant court case last year where four young black men raped, tortured and murdered a young white girl. All four men were found guilty and jailed. It was reported on the BBC but - surprise surprise - never once were the words 'racist crime' uttered. Can you imagine if it had been four white men and a black girl!
The BBC employs a lot of ethnic minorities wo are now starting to be in positions of control and influence, and adjust how the news is reported accordingly. Yes, it is double standards and, yes, it is racism in its own way but, this time, black on white racism.
Good question, glad you asked it. Hope it makes people think!

2007-01-26 21:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by gorgeousfluffpot 5 · 2 2

I purely have been given stated, with the infamous "no longer a question or an answer," while it became certainly an answer, on a question approximately Jehovah's Witnesses and birthday events. I stated that if the questioner have been raised as a JW, she would desire to sense an identical way. curiously people can %. on Jehovah's Witnesses all day long and that is great with YA. (i'm an atheist myself, that's why i will see the silliness in all non secular rituals and quirks.) curiously now there isn't any thank you to protest once you're stated. i do no longer think of YA even reads the flaws that get stated. And, incredibly, the spell verify question is purely stupid, for any faith, yet they could have been dealt with the two. Edit to LOL - Yeah, i'm telling you, they do no longer even examine the question or answer it incredibly is being stated. i detect it insulting. they like me to examine their stupid policies, while i'm completely conscious of them and did no longer violate them--yet they are able to't be bothered to examine the element they violated me for.

2016-11-01 09:56:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No doubt about it.They promote PC,feminism,muti culturism,anti americanism,anti Jewish,anti British and have a left wing slant to their reporting.
The media is supposed to be impartial,the BBC are usually the worst offenders and have recieved many complaints,by viewers and listeners.
They have their own agenda,and want to errode British values and beliefs,dont let them away with it,we have rights too;just not as many as a homosexual Egyptian with 6 wives and a criminal record the length of your arm(who requires political asylum,a car,a home, a mobile phone,and the British people well they can wait on the list for 10 years etc etc)Thats what the BBC likes to see.

2007-01-27 00:03:16 · answer #4 · answered by thefoolofthewheel 1 · 1 2

Not that I’ll be shedding any tears for Murdoch’s red top you understand, but I think in the greater scheme of things, his tacky tabloid is nowhere near as malevolent as the Daily Mail: hate and fear spurts from every page of this vile **** rag, feverishly gripped in a permanent state of outrage about, well, everything.

Ask Paul Dacre.

2007-01-30 04:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by ktbaron 3 · 0 0

The BBC is not infallilible; its just better than any privately owned alternative. I'm sure its always possible to make comparisons like this across all news channels.

2007-01-26 21:04:36 · answer #6 · answered by Well, said Alberto 6 · 2 0

Got it in one. The BBC is running with a Anti British/anti American, left wing, PC, Multicultural, pro minority group right's, pro feminist, you get the idea. Look at the reporting on Palestine/Israel and Iraq.

2007-01-26 21:55:10 · answer #7 · answered by Veritas 7 · 1 2

white journalist are chicken shits to report the truth about racist crimes.hate crime on whites by Negros far exceeds what white people are doing this time in history

2007-01-26 21:41:59 · answer #8 · answered by paco 1 · 2 1

the only reason you say that is because you are white, whites commit more racist murders so get over it! kkk,bnp.combat 18,national front,etc .if i were to kill you it wouldn't be because you are white, its because you are obviously an idiot!

2007-01-26 21:29:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes your right but the thing is mate you cont say enny thing or you are classed as racist just check your answers

2007-01-26 21:43:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers