Since we are unable to actually observe electrons, quarks, muons etc and they are building blocks of 'observable matter' a better description would be either another single word, eg 'mattorite' or a phrase 'the essence of matter', which would give a greater clarity to their role in life.
2007-01-26 20:27:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
they are still matter, they are simply microscopic matter
2007-01-26 20:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by dewaddictman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
strong is at the same time as some thing you want takes position to you. undesirable is at the same time as some thing you don't want takes position to you. Consent is the concept of all morals. you do not thieve because the guy you're taking from did not provide consent. you do not homicide because the guy you kill did not provide consent. you do not rape because the guy you rape does no longer provide consent. It does no longer count number if this sentience is non everlasting. that's all that we've, for this reason, that's all that concerns. Morality comes from residing in a society. All social creatures have them. someone without morals is removed from the society to keep society secure and operating, inspite of the social species.
2016-12-03 02:42:50 · answer #2 · answered by cheathem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whatever u may call it they are definitely matter
they may not be seen but there is enough experimental
evidence of their existence
particles like muons do leave trace marks in bubble chamber experiments
though quarks may not be observed there is experimental proof
we dont see air but cant deny its presence and call by some other name
2007-01-30 16:16:46 · answer #3 · answered by photon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By calling them matterites etc., you are still in the domain of the matter. Why not talk of condensed energy blocks? After all, matter can and does convert into energy and vice versa.
2007-01-26 20:37:03 · answer #4 · answered by Swamy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't we just call then "Particles". That describes the physical nature and we can augment that description with other words like "Charged" (for example) to describe the state they are in.
2007-01-26 20:41:02 · answer #5 · answered by Henry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yah. Perfect thinking;
2007-01-27 13:29:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These are differnt energy packs existing as entities in pre- defined states.
2007-01-26 20:47:06 · answer #7 · answered by babuoe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter.
2007-01-26 20:34:35 · answer #8 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't 'matter' to me.
2007-01-26 20:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by lulu 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not quiet sure
2007-01-26 20:41:35 · answer #10 · answered by Nicklt w 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋