Sub2Quarks particles possible?

Question

Geonium is a man made atom, created at lequid helium temperature in ultrahigh vaccum for an individual electron in magnatic and electric trapping feilds. For this atom the electron gyromagnatic ratio g=2000 000 000110(60) has been measured im microwave spectroscopy experiments after substraction of quantum electrodynamics shifts. The g-g Dirac=11x10*-11 excess over the value g Dirac=2 for the theoretical Dirac point electron suggest for the electron of nature a corrosponding excess radius Re-RDirac ovar the Dirac Radius R dirac=0 and spatial Structure. This is well Known Ok. A near Dirac particles an electron radius Re~=
10*-20 centemeter had been extraplotted. In the Big Bang Cosmology, a close to zero or zero mass particle and antiparticle is higly required as per Fremi Yang model, which indicate nothing state (zero mass) that resulted a spontanoius quantum jump in QED and actually initiated the Big Bang. and the particle antiparticle were in Spin[ Dirac point particles]. So far we Know Quark - antiquark particles as most elementary particles. Some are of view as Nutrinos particles. Quarks has at finest level has colour as energy. In 1974 Abdul Salam- A Ex Student from Calcutta university, Citizen of Pakistan by Birth, Nobel Lauratee in Physics & also others pictured the electron and found a particle on the level of quark as composed of three subquarks each 10*10 times havier than electron in Gev as the proton is composed of three spin 1/2 particles.
Is it possible to have a sub sub quarks or Sub2 quarks particles all tightly bound in the nucleon?- This particles must be the Sub X qurks, smaller & smaller, less & less imperfect near Dirac particles held together by new stronger & stronger froces and with ever increasing mass in Gev- Probably in the bigining moment (zero time) of our universe the Big Bang in one spontanious quantum jump in an individual Ba+ ion, in which metastable state decayed in to finally nucleon- anti nucleon pair. Fremi Yang idea still demands zero total relativistic energy or mass of bound pair

Answer 1

thanks for the story

Answer 2

at least there is someone out there thinking as a creator,yes i would think their is many layers so small yet so big in their own stature making up a quark of existance if i had to number the layer it would be 0 or 1 and probably invest in the latest magnifier to find the next 1.good luck in your search and it could very well be that all elements in creation have not been disclosed yet

Answer 3

I think you've implied the answer to your question... with enough energy, a sub quark is not only possible but inescapable, the questions are: how many of them will there be? What fraction(s) of quarks energies will they have? And what symmetries will they display?

Answer 4

regrettably we are able to basically somewhat adventure ourselves from our attitude. How do i understand that your question isn't a build of my techniques and that i'm the only component in existence which has any understanding. each and every thing I adventure exterior of myself could be an tricky falsehood geared up via my techniques to provide up myself from turning out to be lonely and going mad. i won't be able to even start to respond to which communities of debris have some point of understanding till i understand what's and is not any longer authentic. whether i replaced into to locate the answer to my subject i'll in no way understand what it extremely is desire to be a collection of debris that represent a stone so how am i able to in all probability answer your question. i could may be the stone, then i could nevertheless no longer understand if the debris that make up a cloud have the comparable.