Heck no. KG is a gamer. Those three are flashes who play when they feel like it. The Knicks are like some weird vortex of infinite talent paired with wretched attitudes. But it'd be a fine trade for KG. I mean, the Knicks'd find a way to extend his contract into 2100 and overpay him just in time to pay some other team more money to take him off their hands.
2007-01-26 18:38:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by SnowFlats 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like Charles Barkley said on NBA game yesterday, trading Kevin Garnett is not going to be the answer to the T-wolves' problems. The Wolves gotta start going in another direction (i.e; get younger and start rebuilding). I'd say if you're the Knicks, you definately make the trade, if you're the Wolves, heck no. Wait until the end of the season and then take your time in pursuing which direction to go.
2007-01-26 19:36:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by P.I. Stingray 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
For that much players for 1? I think it's a possibility for me to go with the trade. If I'm on the side of the T'wolves. But I don't think so if I'm on NY
2007-01-26 18:59:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Holden® [ThumbZUP] tRoLL PaTrOL 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would keep some from both teams, u have to have kg and stephon but i would also want to keep jamal crawford, and eddy curry from the knicks that is all i have to say since they both aren't very well put together teams at the moment
2007-01-26 18:37:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justin W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
save crawford, he scored 52 today
2007-01-26 18:33:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rowell C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I would
2007-01-26 18:35:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe, What are their stats?
2007-01-26 18:36:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Allister Black Metal 1
·
0⤊
0⤋