English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Don't political candidates usually have to pay for this kind of coverage? Can't this 'featured question' stuff be concidered a violation of the McCain-Feingold Election Reform Law?

2007-01-26 17:05:09 · 12 answers · asked by FRANKFUSS 6 in Politics & Government Government

Forget the fact that I do not like this woman. I just find it repulsive that Yahoo continues to pander to one side of the political isle. Where is the ballance? Hell, I would even love it if John Edwars was featured. It would show less bias.

2007-01-26 17:38:30 · update #1

FEDUPMOMA, Have you even READ the M-F reform???? I doubt it. But your attack on me is typical of what I would expect from the left. I won't delete your answer, it only goes to show what you are and your party are about. BIAS

2007-01-27 04:23:39 · update #2

12 answers

do you not read yahoo news; isn't everyday free political advertising for the libs?

2007-01-26 17:11:46 · answer #1 · answered by David W 3 · 4 0

I doubt that Yahoo is giving anybody free advertising and this includes Mrs. Clinton too.
Just because you don't like her doesn't mean that Yahoo should not use her name to ask some very important questions and if you don't like it then don't look at the questions and no, there is no violation of the Mc-Feingold Election Reform Law here at all.
You're just pissed to see her name here and the fact you don't like her is the reason for your question and maybe you are also waiting for someone to file an abuse against Yahoo for letting the question be asked.
Don't worry, it will go away shortly and then you can bark about something or someone else.
My answer my get deleted but this is the way I see it and you are the one who asked the question and this is my answer to it.

2007-01-26 20:55:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Forever, lets face it, Clinton gave Communist China Missile technology, and Yahoo helped China censer the Internet Dissent. China bought the Clinton presidency, and yahoo loves the socialist aspect of the "new" democratic party.

Much in common, they will find a way to do it. Just like CNN, and CBS.

2007-01-26 17:15:28 · answer #3 · answered by impalersca 4 · 2 1

The Clintons are so popular and Yahoo are making news of them to attract people to surf on Yahoo thereby making free advertisements for them.

2007-01-26 17:10:43 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

I don't think that any of these "official" people are really the people they are supposed to be.. They have more to do than be on here. YA wants people to believe that it's real. They are trying to attract more people to YA by saying they are official... I don't anymore believe they are official than I believe in Santa.

2007-01-26 18:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by chilover 7 · 1 1

I just want to know why there aren't any Republican canidates doing the same. If one side can get in on here the other side should.

2007-01-26 17:17:39 · answer #6 · answered by wondermom 6 · 3 1

I brought this up in the forum...my thread was deleted. You know what we should do? All we conservatives? Change our avatars to conservative candidates or politicians to fight this left-wing conspiratorial clap-trap.

2007-01-26 19:41:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

FRANKFUSS, guess it does really hurt to realize that so many here do love Hillary, eh?

2007-01-26 17:14:08 · answer #8 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0 3

As long as I'm on Yahoo, I'll keep on giving them ad time. GO HILLARY!

2007-01-26 17:12:40 · answer #9 · answered by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5 · 0 4

Until she is a shoe in.

2007-01-26 17:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers