Refering to muscular definition, and more upper body strength compared to those who don't work out.
and why?
2007-01-26 16:26:15 · 22 answers · asked by Saphire Aurora 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Not muscular like a bodybuilder but muscle tone is nice.
2007-01-26 16:32:08 · answer #1 · answered by Nico 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Muscular legs can be HOT but NOT upper body strength. Women aren't suppose to have triangular bodies you know. So manly.
2007-01-26 16:37:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not, because on a female, muscles make her look masculine, and THAT is an enormous turn off for me and probably most people. It is definitely not an attractive look, by ANY stretch of the imagination, period. Muscles look good on men, because men are masculine by nature. We're men. Now women, on the other hand, should be feminine. That is attractive to me.
2007-01-26 16:42:24 · answer #3 · answered by David 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes they are hot as long as they don't over do it and it keeps the sag away that takes place in later years. Hope this helps.
2007-01-26 16:35:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not like Ms Universe but I like muscles
2007-01-26 16:32:49 · answer #5 · answered by Roxie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NOT...but they look good when they are toned...muscular looks like men...they look UgLeY!
2007-01-26 16:56:20 · answer #6 · answered by November 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
skinning is good --girls are not to be manly--keep wearing the dress's and short/shorts
2007-01-26 16:37:24 · answer #7 · answered by gibson_smark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh god, not. cos it just takes the figure away, i mean, look at Serena Williams. *** but NO shape
2007-01-26 16:33:52 · answer #8 · answered by maddywoo13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
not hot.. i like feminine girls
you probably won't find me dating an athlete
but those girls who jog and stuff and have toned legs... that's ok
2007-01-26 16:33:13 · answer #9 · answered by some_one1234 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
not. women should not be more muscular then men
2007-01-26 16:43:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋