The Pnac report(project for a new american century) report was written in 2000?

Question

It s signatory members include Cheney ,Wolfovitz Rummy and company.It clearly outlines American foreign policy for now and the future.My question is why do so many believe in the Bush Admin .when this report is being implemented RIGHT NOW.
Its crux is world domination by military might
here is the link http://www.newamericancentury.org/

Answer 1

Don't confuse them with the facts. This one, and many others like http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965 about Bush's secret North American Union, the SuperState of Mexico, Canada, and the US with no borders in between, are so shocking that it is too difficult to look at, let alone accept. That Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, and the now famous Scooter Libby, among others had already dicussed taking Iraq, dominating the Persian Gulf, etc., and that the time was right now that the Soviet Union had collapsed and we were alone at the top of Superpowerdom, all this sounds like a conspiracy theory. We can only hope some will read, think, and wonder about "what is wrong with this picture?"

Answer 2

I seem to remember reading that the PNAC dociment actually was written in a/as a draft document in the early 90's as a missive about what to do to keep the military strong in the absence of a soviet threat and as a call-to-arms for the once failing neoconservative movement (back in the early 90's the neocon movement almost collapsed) the prototype of what became the PNAC statement was drafted at that time (possibly during the presidency of Bush 1) by Paul Wolfowitz.

It was resurrected during the Gulf war but never thoroughly implemented because many in the Bush 1 administration were/are conservative realists, however it was rehashed and presented to President Clinton in the Mid-Late 1990's.


My experience was shaped personally after I made a (what I thought) was a reasonable statement that we didn't have to unswervingly support every action of Israel (Israel had bombed an airport the US had just finished building for the Palestinians) and a very conservative friend of mine (well call "Paul") vehemently and (I thought at the time) "out of the blue" started defending "neocons" and the vital interests of Israel - as if they were one and the same and somehow linked to US interests. By the end of dinner my rather obvious question had my friend stating that I was a communist or a traitor and possibly was being antisemetic or some combination of all three.
Without very much provocation I clearly had touched a nerve.

I remember leaving dinner that night and going home to look up the term neocon - at the time I was rather politically unaware but skilled up a bit and found ot what was going on, still not quite convinced.

I then made a point of talking to a fairly rabidly liberal friend of mine (we'll call "John") - whom I view kind of like the antithesis of my conservative friend Paul, and he sent me what a video called "What Barry Says" which at the time I thought was positively on the fringe of rational discourse, Of course now, after the war and the warmongering and mental and ethical lapses of this administration it seems positively well reasoned.

Neocon : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservative
What Barry Says : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1669325314815164245

Answer 3

1998.

Even crazier, Fox News has Bill Kristol on to discuss the war, when he was one if it's architects writing the PNAC report!

Answer 4

Republicans are not fans of that link. Do you have a government link or maybe yahoo news?