2007-01-26 16:01:14 · 24 answers · asked by amir j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not if when.
The great media machine is already cranking up the anti-iran prooganda. I predict before June.
2007-01-26 16:12:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iran continues down the current path- yes. Iran is playing with fire, and the iranian goverment has to be one of the dumbest on the planet to keep it up.
They should back down and give up on the nuclear program while they still have a country- or "freedom and democracy" will come to Iran as well!
Lets see- after Iraq and Afganistan- lets make the US president mad....Real smart!
And Iran would probably fly under the radar if they were not causing trouble- they don't really have that much oil.
2007-01-27 00:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by castlekeepr 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think "the decider" aka ..."the decision maker" will try to get us into as much bloody conflict as he possibly can during his remaining time in office. I think he enjoys war and that the war on Iraq was planned long before the term terrorist became an everyday word. He will not be satisfied until he has instigated World War 3. I love my country but I fear this President. He cares not what the American people think or want. He has forgotten he works for us. It is no longer a government for the people, by the people, of the people. It is a do what I say government regardless of what the people want. This man is out of control.
2007-01-27 00:32:26 · answer #3 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. This year.
1) Iran needs to be stoped.
2) 08 is an election year, it's hard to take a major initiative then.
3) in 09 & after, there is no way to know who will be pres. Bush can't trust a Dem to take necessary action.
Therefore action must be taken in 07.
1) We have sent 2 carrier battle groups to the persian gulf.
2) The new Centcom boss is a naval aviator. This is not a coincidence.
This means we are getting ready to bomb someone near the Persian Gulf. Iran is the only logical target there.
2007-01-27 00:27:13 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we don't than Israel will and that will cause more problems. Europe, Russia and China are too dependent on Iranian income to take a firm stand against them. Trying to occupy Iran would be a mistake but bombing them back into the stone age will take care of the problem. Naturally Pelosi and the over the hill democratic leadership will complain instead of backing the action. Words are cheaper than actions and with the liberal media the inaccuracies of the dummycratic positions will never come out.
2007-01-27 00:10:13 · answer #5 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
very definite maybe...Iran thinks we are over-extended...and we are for a volunteer army...but if we need to, we can take it all away from them...it would be hard for us in terms of the at-home feeling of war, but some Liberals could believe this as an actual threat and be behind it, depending on how it plays out...the US can not be seen as the aggressor in this....I don't think the US wants to keep one acre of Iran, it'll just destroy it. I think it is stupid of Iran to support the insurgency in Iraq...that could be seen by us as an act of war and the US might even be granted an UN mandate for defending Iraq's sovereignty
2007-01-27 00:12:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By itself, No. But if Israel did the US will definitely jump in and justify it by protecting their ally. The US could barely hold Iraq and Afghanistan down, and also bombing Somalia. But with the help of another Nuclear Power like Israel, attacking Iran and defeating them would be easier.
2007-01-27 00:18:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mag1527 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iranian intelligence officers are already credited with killing US personnel. This is not completely verified, but if true, Iran will pay a very steep price. Their leader will wish he had just stayed an engineer.
2007-01-27 02:32:53 · answer #8 · answered by david m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran is developing nukes and space technology, if they do not cease either the US or Israel will have to.
In fair warning to the Iranian people; the politically correct war in Iraq is a luxury, as we fight in more places the tactics will have to get tougher. We allow the insurgents in Iraq but if it gets too tough we will have to level cities. It is a matter of survival.
2007-01-27 00:08:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Iran may leave the US no other choice. They are sneaking over the Iraqi border and killing US soldiers. They are training and supplying weapons to militants. They keep making statements that in my opinion, if taken at face value, make it imperative for the free world to obliterate them.
2007-01-27 00:09:19 · answer #10 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋