English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hhaving 20,000 extra troops along the Iran border would make it easier for a quick attack.

Get ready for a DRAFT rich boys

2007-01-26 15:47:05 · 11 answers · asked by Taco 2 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

draft them fuucker,,plus add two,,,two of everything to them rich boys...but the 20,000 more troops is suppose to liberate Baghdad and make it safe,,for picnics and Muslim holidays etc,,,,bush must be packing hog wash...cheers civilian

2007-01-26 15:58:55 · answer #1 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 0 0

There will be no draft. It would be political suicide. The surge is to provide the proper troop level to beat down the enemy. If it has the added benefit of making the Iranian leaders nervous then that is the bonus.

When creating childish conspiracy theories please stick to UFO's and black helicopters they are just plain more fun.

Besides weren't the rich not included in the Vietnam draft, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect them to be excluded from this war. See you need to concoct more plausible bullsh!t.

2007-01-26 23:55:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

There is no rational reason to attack Iraq. They have attacked no one - certainly not the US - the idea they are building nuke bombs is pure speculation with no basis in fact.

They support Hezbollah - so what? We supported Saddam against them in their little war. The US doesn't have a leg to stand on - unless Bush decides to start lying again. See where it got us before.

2007-01-27 00:05:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is no surge only an increase in troop levels. If they do have a draft, lets hope they take all those who didn't graduate from high school, that'll teach the lazy !@#$%^&&* No more gravy train with biscuit wheels

2007-01-26 23:56:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

more than likely... and if there is a draft as a matter of history it's done on a lotto system or alphabetically...
And no bush is not the anti Christ every body will love the man in black from he, double toothpicks he will unite the world at first peace will be present... do you see peace?

2007-01-26 23:52:41 · answer #5 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 2 0

There is no great hidden agenda.
I orderb to invade ieaq you would need about 120,000 troops. And we have our hands full with Iraq.
But I hope we help lead an underground rebellion Those people have been living in Hell long enough.

2007-01-26 23:59:17 · answer #6 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0 1

Just the next step in the plan. Syria is next after Iran.

2007-01-26 23:53:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Well congratulations,Bush finally found an enemy with a uniform.

2007-01-26 23:50:17 · answer #8 · answered by Dfirefox 6 · 1 0

If that's what it takes. Iran cannot have nukes. Or Iraq.

2007-01-26 23:55:04 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2 2

Your liberal threats are meaningless but typical of your party.

2007-01-26 23:52:22 · answer #10 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers