It means we are responsible for the safety of the civilians throughout certain zone that we claim to occupy. At the beginning of the war we occupied everything. Now we release the responsibility of more and more areas to local police and the Iraqi Army. Eventually we hope to hand over all sectors.
2007-01-26 15:27:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jonathan S 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
1. It is wrong. But since already the government there has been made nothing, the presence there upto the propped up regime fully in control is inevitable.
2. The Democracy story is all fraud. Why action is not being taken for bringing Democracy in Pakistan? Because the General there is wanted for carrying out things favourable.
3. By same analogy why no intervention in Myanmar to bring democracy, to make the electred representative Madame Su Kyi take the power there.
4. Has any peace committee consisting of Shia, Sunni and Khurds been formed, so that Iraq remains a single country?
Obviously, intentions are not that.
VR
2007-01-26 23:36:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by sarayu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we were truly occupying Iraq, then we'd have control like we did when we occupied Japan or Germany. We don't have control. We are stuck in the middle of a civil war.
2007-01-26 23:28:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
to get iraq to become a democratic country and to rebuld its society to be able to get it back on its feet before saddam tookover then everything changed to the way it is now.
2007-01-26 23:26:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by bizzie 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
One side sees it as liberation, other side sees it as occupation.
2007-01-26 23:26:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
In hopes that they will change to our ways.
2007-01-27 01:51:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ruggedwarrior_love 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a mistake.
2007-01-26 23:31:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
do your own homework research. my brother just did this same homework.
2007-01-26 23:29:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by m c 5
·
0⤊
2⤋