I'm betting on Newt. What do you say?
2007-01-26 15:19:42 · 16 answers · asked by Laughing Man Copycat 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chuck Hagel.
2007-01-26 15:24:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
with the aid of fact Republicans are professional-existence, which could teach those idiots who're too stupid and AIDS infested to apply a condom that get pregnant in the past even being married. with the aid of fact they suspect that we could continually have the ability to have weapons, with the aid of fact the only those that would desire to surely no longer very own a gun are the harmless people. I mean, come on, that's why they are called criminals, they do no longer obey the regulation. you rather anticipate a offender, a bent citizen to renounce their gun?? additionally, with the aid of fact Republicans comprehend that international peace is bodily and mentally impossible, that there's no longer international peace. We could have wars to maintain the international so as. If we did no longer, we would finally end up like France, getting stomped on by utilising another united states. ultimately, the death-penalty! Come on, you rather need to spend all your tax money on prisons, protecting the vicious killers alive?? i think of they could lead on them to bleed to death or some thing to teach them a lesson. Murderers do no longer deserve the superb to existence, heck, they do no longer even deserve any rights in any respect!! How have they arrive to deserve any rights?? The Clinton's are evil people, who signed NAFTA and gave another united states as nicely usa our jobs! Why else do you think of the financial equipment is so undesirable? there isn't any jobs over right here, that is all in China, the country whose at the instant been attempting to poison our toothpaste, puppy foodstuff, youngster's toys, and each little thing else! we at the instant are not even they are allies!! The Clinton's have been given into the white domicile by the chinese language Mafia of direction!
2016-11-01 09:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say, Brownback, or Hagel in 2008 because they balancing out west wing of GOP, and Southern Wings the best chance to win.
2007-01-26 15:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by ram456456 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Repubs better hope it isn't Newt that guy has zero chance of winning in a general election. I would hope they would be smart enough to elect Giulliani. He has a great chance of winning if he gets through the primary
2007-01-26 15:24:58 · answer #4 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Newt won't win because of the US media....if he come close to winning the US media will turn him into a clown. Remember H. Dean?
The US President must be totally corrupted or stupid in order to be projected as a leader by the US Media = CNN + Fox + ABC + CBS + NBC
2007-01-26 15:27:41 · answer #5 · answered by mr america 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's a real good question. Giuliani at the moment is the only one I would trust. Newt made himself so unpopular once before I doubt he will run for President.
2007-01-26 15:26:23 · answer #6 · answered by cartiphilus 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Jeff Gannon
2007-01-26 16:55:27 · answer #7 · answered by catcha22 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condoleezza Rice
2007-01-26 15:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by budinok 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Newt would be the most conservative of the bunch, which means he would be harassed mercifully by the media. Giuliani will quite probably be the nomination. But, a lot can happen in 2 years.
2007-01-26 15:24:09 · answer #9 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is way to early in the election cycle to predict the nominee, there has never been a case where they have been accurately predicted this early out without an incumbent.
2007-01-26 15:26:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋