English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems like some of the most usefull parts of adult hood...(i.e., saving for retirement, paying taxes, adopting a personal finance plan, investing in the market...etc) are barely touched upon in a general education's curriculum. Why?

2007-01-26 15:17:23 · 6 answers · asked by Courtney O 1 in Social Science Economics

6 answers

Some high schools do.

I teach a volunteer Business/Economics course one day a week at an inner city high school - they require their seniors to take one semester of personal finance, and one semester of entrepreneurship.

Hopefully this is a step to getting these kids out of the inner city - God knows a lot of their parents won't.

2007-01-26 15:48:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I went to high school in Southern Ca and in our freshman year 15 years ago, there was a required class called Life Skills/ Study Skills
and it taught banking how to write checks and balance checkbooks and your life as you enter adulthood, we also took Economics and Civics where current world events were our topics and econ taught us how to track stocks and making financial plans and even running a small business, I was also fortunate enough to be able to take a small business management course as part of an ROP program and recieved a degree in sbm all while I was in high school. I am sure the class is still available there today. It was very benificial and even ran my own Towing Co for years!!

2007-01-26 15:31:11 · answer #2 · answered by useless_knowledge 3 · 0 0

presently, there are state mandated skillability checks that scholars ought to bypass in the previous they could be able to graduate, so instructors ought to augment direction plans to get the final public of scholars previous that hurdle. college committees are also suffering to stay interior budgets that taxpayers are keen to help, so there is worthwhile little funding for those fundamentals, a lot less money for preparation useful classes like you're soliciting for. per chance if all our college graduates were properly knowledgeable and ought to locate properly paying jobs, or created new wealth for themselves, they, as taxpayers, would not ideas parting with it to pay for most of those classes. because it is, i do not imagine which will take position quickly. quite, we are going to see more desirable colleges dropping artwork instructions, song preparation and events. type sizes will boost and good instructors will proceed to depart the occupation because they could be able to't make a respectable salary attempting to teach our little ones.

2016-10-16 04:06:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

education is like a flywheel it is hard to get moving but once it starts it is impossible to stop-as long as the fuel is dumped in the thing will create havoc til it is stopped-disinformation & underachievers delimma are the product of it's composite, most educators are waiting just like america for some one to stand up and lead the way out but it will die on the vine just like christ for it will be scorned as impossible to remake what everyone already hates except the people who administrate it, look at who gets funded for what and it is in the whole that is a mass of corruption that neither doing democrate or republican the head games is bait and switch till you run out of energy to give a damn and they just laugh all the way to the bank~waiting for the honorable ssecond world war vets to die off before plundering the earth~value were taken off the table as thoses trust were deleted

2007-01-28 08:42:11 · answer #4 · answered by bev 5 · 0 0

I think a lot of it depends on the school and their requirements. Where I went to school these things were taught and not just touched on.

2007-01-26 15:26:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know. Good idea.

2007-01-26 15:25:25 · answer #6 · answered by ginarene71 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers