Hillary, just because I think women should be given the chance to govern.
I have not been impressed with the performance of the men of late.
2007-01-31 05:47:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by james l 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the financial gadget would be particularly undesirable by skill of skill of November so people won't care approximately McCain's remote places insurance adventure, all they'll care approximately his financial policies and all he has presented is a continuation of the Bush tax cuts so a democrat will win. that's going to be Obama until the present church subject concerns weaken him sufficient contained interior the coming near near primaries to persuade the occasion that he would be a susceptible candidate for the basically spectacular election. some professionals think of he could get below 40% of the optimal votes and if the are spectacular Hilary gets the nomination.
2016-11-27 21:10:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay Collegiate Brew, I will assist in your study, No I will not pick and choose based on favoritisms. Either or does not work in this case scenario because again it is too much like sterotyping?
Obama being a 50/50 Black and White a minority and Muslim?
Hillary Clinton a white woman who holds a prominent seat in the Senate and does not place her religion as a prop to be elected? hmmmmm? They are both Dems, and to join each other in their crusades to win might be the best choice, rather than compete. It seems they have the race, creed, color, religions, poor, middle class, ummm? uh? Yep I think they have it covered for votes to unite. I will vote for both on one ticket or not at all. Because if they are serious about helping us and being our leader, than they will shake hands as team mates and reassure us of their unity, But if they seperate then we know one or both is all about their own personal brigade of causes and a mission of filling their own agendas with Ego, then they are not the Party for me and certainly not my choice of a leader for our American Government. Actually they would be a disgrace, Reagan and Bush were rivals in the Republican primary and Bush resigned from the race to join Reagan, now that was the plan all along and that was to keep all other capable republicans out of the primary race so that Reagan would win, and their game was a well played hand like the winner at Texas hold em, eh? So the rest is history , they successfully held the President's chair for 12 years between the two of them. Vote for both on one ticket.
2007-01-26 15:23:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd love to vote for Barack Obama in 6 years when he has more experience (you never said when we would vote for them!). I think he is the perfect candidate except doesn't have enough experience which oddly enough even he was admitting a few months ago...Hilary Clinton was too pro-war re: Iraq for too long for me to be fired up about her as a candidate.
2007-01-26 17:44:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the world is ready for a female president, nor do I think she is the one for the job. She has many ghosts in her closet that keep popping up and I have to wonder if they are true. Besides that she is married to one of the most dispicable men of all time. He has no morals or integrity and he is dishonest. How can a woman of moral character who wants to run this country stay with a man like that? I would vote for Obama.
2007-01-26 15:11:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anna Hennings 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
if you want an unbiased response for a poll or study, don't weight the question. I would also advise A blind study- just ask the question, and don't announce what tis' for. Better results that way. If you do use the answers from this, include a copy of the question and any comments you made.
as to the question, I do not like one vote in particular for one of them, not the vote itself, but the fact that they still defend it as the right decsion despite massive evidence the other way.
But right now I intend to vote for Edwards in the Primary, or Bill Richardson. possibly the candidate not implied above from your question.
2007-01-26 15:14:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Big Box 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hilary Clinton-the US needs big changes and a woman President may see things in a different perspective. She has experience because she was the first lady, I am sure she knows much more than Obama.
2007-01-26 15:07:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Urchin 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Don't know/need to learn more about their individual differences. I'm definitely voting Democrat next election, I'd be happy with either.
2007-01-26 15:11:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by joie_du_cor 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
if those are my only choices i would chose obama. He seems to be more human than hillary. And honestly i wouldn't vote democrate anyhow.
2007-01-26 15:12:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Barb 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hillary!!!!
2007-01-26 15:33:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋