all joking aside, hillary i'm sure is an intelligent woman in her own right and will be very effective and forward thinking in her campaign and the yahoo answers gig was just that; quite brilliant if you ask me. i don't think she has a dogs chance in hell of winning as she will totally polarize this country and conservatives will come out in droves against her (my feeling is there are a lot more conservatives who will Rock the Vote against and extreme liberal than liberals who will rock the vote against an extreme conservative) but she knows a few things about campaigning and if not has plenty of friends who do. health care is an important issue in this country as our system can be very unequitable. however, i think the major disconnect is that how on earth can we decide who are societies dead beats that sponge off the system and who truly needs help and for how long should they have it. i'm sure that the people who want universal health care have very good and compassionate hearts but my problem has always been if we dolve out health care for all, why the hell am i working 10, 12 or 16 hours days to make good money. i'm smart, why don't i get universal health care, food stamps and sit on my *** and suck from the system. trust me, i love to fish and backpack and could find a lot of good uses for my time if ultimately i wasn't worried about what might happen to should i choose not to work. of course, i like working so that is rhetorical but my point is why do we keep making it easier on those in this country who are unwilling to even try to achieve?
2007-01-26 15:07:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by David W 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hillary want to fix healthcare get the goverment out of healthcare or just nationalize the whole system. Hillary Clintpon wont make major chaanges to healthcare because that be one less poltical issuse to beat up republicans with. Bush idea is a good idea since a lot of health insurane companies pay for things that are wasteful. One, a person gets the insurance company to pay for a old persons golf cart to golf, so the person can get excercise that is bill to the insurnace compay for $15,000. Two, Scotish study found 75% of surgeries were unnescessary since the outcome did not improve thier life expectancy. Three, adminstrative waste sucks 20% to 50% of healthcare dollars before treatment is really done. Healthcare costs will beat inflation until we accept that we are only desgined to live 75 to 80 years.
2007-01-26 15:36:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ram456456 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
She cares about winning the election.
Besides you don't want a government health care plan. You want to have government stop the "health care taxes" in place and create an open market in the medical industry. This will introduce competition and drive down prices.
A federal government health care plan is a terrible idea because you will be forced to pay for it, they will take the money right out of your pay check. Its not "free" by any measure. Also like public education you will be forced to pay for it even if you don't have kids. If you get a private (and worthwhile) plan you STILL pay for it. Do you really want to pay for riddlin for every kid that thinks they need it?
I want everyone to be healthy but, government is not the answer. I'm looking at my paycheck now and if I didn't pay Medicare "taxes" I could pay for a private health insurance plan as is.
The solution is to give people back their money so they can freely choose a plan that works for them.
2007-01-26 15:25:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by k X 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I truthfully tend to be somewhat cynical approximately those issues. i've got self assurance for Hillary Clinton it extremely is a PR circulate. some "voters" will learn it and say, "She extremely cares approximately us," and so as that they've an inclination to think of that's yet one greater reason to assist her run for President. truthfully, a answer will basically be found while President, Representatives and Senators initiate putting people and this u . s . a . forward of their needs to do in spite of the fact that it takes to get elected. no one guy or woman, no count if President or congressman will sparkling up the wellbeing care disaster.
2016-12-16 14:32:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I think she does care about health care for Ameicans. Currently there are 47 million people that are without access to affordable health care. This is a growing problem in the U.S. The CEO of General Moters has said that $1500 of every new car sold goes to pay for the health care of its employee's, this you pay when you buy a new car, I am sure that it can be found a problem in many industrys and this in turn makes the US at a definite disadvantage in global trade. Something needs to be done in the form of health care reform. I do think she cares about this issue.
2007-01-26 15:01:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Of course she does. She introduced a plan when her husband was president that made a lot of sense. Unfortunately it fell to the politics of the good old boy insurance providers and politicians who really do not care about the people who vote then in.
2007-01-26 15:02:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Based on past experience the Democrats have done much better with health care. Especially for the middle class.
2007-01-26 15:01:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No because she wants "the village" to raise the kids and take care of everyone and that is socialism (rob from the successful and give to the lazy)
Hard work and not government handouts are rewards. Hillary only cares about votes and nothing else.
2007-01-26 15:00:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hillary only cares about saying what the people want to hear.
2007-01-26 15:00:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by CJBig 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You know the answer. No one hears from here until she wants something. She failed on health once, she will fail again.
2007-01-26 15:04:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by americanmalearlington 4
·
3⤊
0⤋