better late than never or traitors,,,or something more creative,,a new bush word for it? what you think...
2007-01-26 14:26:39 · 13 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
adam,,,get it right please,,,bush the decider is the only one to initiate the war,,,,not we ,,,and not the miss information,,,just the mind of lies ,to the people,,,so now should be having a hemmorage over ,,,the mess...we did not decide to go in,,,it was force feed hog wash,,,or wash of the hog,,,,,peace,,,civilian
2007-01-26 14:49:15 · update #1
andy.... your point is taken,,,and understood,,,but one must face the truth on both sides of the coin,,,not just one,,,,,the decider G.B is suppose to understand that too,,,but he does not,,,,,so with that fact in mind ,,,and the greatest respect for america and our troops ,we must be able to think for ourselves...and the majority will previal from such..civilian
2007-01-26 14:57:19 · update #2
ray,,,yes,,,but what you seek ,,i do not...i am not that liberal in world views. my america is no. 1...guns and death and bombs are part of the process,but in a ordered way,,,with a stable hand on the trigger ,and lotes of politics ,before lead,,not lead first,,,you are speaking of the world peace,,,not time yet...but refreshing,,,,we must all try it...civilian
2007-01-26 15:03:31 · update #3
Unfortunately if we leave we will leave iraq in shambles and more vulnerable to attacks than before, and the whole mission would be completely counter productive. Yes, it is overdue. The truth is that we rushed into war too fast for one to develop. That tells you something about how fast we decided to go in.
edit: we meaning the nation. It is not Bush overthere by himself with an ak47 and a water bottle over there fighting the war. There are other people involved. Also, while things are not running as well at all now, I do not think that it is fair to pin it all on Bush's shoulders. We had faulty intelligence reports, and many people, including Hillary Clinton herself, based on the intelligence reports that we had, thought war was the right idea. Just because somebody does not have the same opinion as you doesnt mean they are wrong.
2007-01-26 14:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by Adam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dec 7, 1941 America was attacked with about 2400 causalities. The American people came together and gave 100% to defeat the enemy.
9/11 America was once again attacked with over 3000 causalities and we squabble. We talk about peace with an enemy who has sworn to fight and kill Americans until America has become a Muslim State.
Bush lied, about what? Every major intelligence agency in the free world had drawn the same conclusions that Bush had. The majority of Democrats agreed after viewing the same info.
Bush has done what America has always done after a conflict. Rebuild the country, in this case attempt to rebuild, the same as was done with Japan and Germany.
Maybe everyone would prefer a president who governed by poll without regard for ethics or right and wrong.
2007-01-26 16:35:02 · answer #2 · answered by doobie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By about 4 years.
2007-01-26 14:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the peace march is a good thing we should call for them not only in the USA but all over the world specially Iran, we should call for the good people of Iran to stand we the good people of the world and hold antinuclear protest,let's call on our brother in the middle east to stand with us and rally against terrorism, lets stop war in all fronts and we need the help of all the brother and sister of this planet to end it. let's all say it together, "NO MORE WARS" "NO MORE TERRORIST" "NO MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS" leave in peace my brothers
2007-01-26 14:56:21 · answer #4 · answered by ray 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Long overdue. The question is will it ever make the news? With the kind of news we have today, I can imagine 1 million people showing up and it never making the evening Corporate News Channels.
2007-01-26 14:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There's been marches and protests since the start of the war. Some might feel it is a good way to voice their opinion but I don't think it is "overdue." There has been plenty of protesting going on already.
2007-01-26 14:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by Roman Soldier 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is protected as free speech but it would be better to show support rather than dissent and hate
2007-01-26 14:48:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jane Fonda is one of the speakers imagine that?
2007-01-26 14:37:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. DC needs peace. Are they going to round up the drug dealers, pimps, and other assorted miscreants and ship them to Iraq where they can do some good? In that case, I'm all for it.
2007-01-26 14:31:53 · answer #9 · answered by Rick N 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
feel free to march down pennsylvania avenue anytime you want.
2007-01-26 14:46:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋