this is a rhetorical question. no answer is necessary.
2007-01-26 14:07:01 · 11 answers · asked by chewbakah 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ah, well, it so deserves a proper answer... Hell, I'd donate money to help the 'bag o cats' win!
2007-01-26 14:12:09 · answer #1 · answered by Nightstalker1967 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A bag of cats would have more intelligence that George W. It can also come up with a better plan for Iraq. Dumb@ss Pres.
2007-01-26 14:17:11 · answer #2 · answered by Killer Klingon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know no answer is necessary, but my answer is yes. In fact I think that the cats would probably make more informed deciosions than Bush, and they would have higher IQ's!
2007-01-26 17:45:59 · answer #3 · answered by crazychick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh? I like cats better than squirrels as the latter are not pets. Have you read the Tao of Pooh?
2016-05-24 03:58:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Don Rickles first.
2007-01-26 14:35:51 · answer #5 · answered by robert m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for a loaf of moldy bread, before I would vote for him.
2007-01-26 14:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no answer necessary but the answer is yes.
2007-01-26 14:12:32 · answer #7 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
get back to us when you can post with some semblance of intelligence.
2007-01-26 14:12:38 · answer #8 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i can tell there's one pussy i won't vote for... hillary
2007-01-26 14:22:33 · answer #9 · answered by David W 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
hahaha yesyes i would.
2007-01-26 14:11:04 · answer #10 · answered by blank 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋