Sorry, the Roman Empire, may have ceased as an open military force to be reckoned with, but it never really went away. It evolved into the Roman Catholic Church, with a Pope instead of a Caesar and Bishops instead of Governors.
It is still an expansionist empire of sorts, but it developed itself into a form that can creep into almost every country in the world. With a xenophobic nature and a very large publicity machine, in many ways it is still just as much of a threat as it ever was. Some could even say that this incarnation is more successful than it’s pervious incarnation, as it gains political control without the responsibility of government.
This may seem like a conspiracy theory, but if you simply look at modern history it becomes blatantly obvious. Just look at its stance during WW2 (standing back and taking a neutral stance when Hitler tried to wipe out the Jewish people) or during the so-called Dark-Ages, (trying to destroy all people of non-catholic beliefs that they could not convert). Instead of spies and emissaries they have missionaries.
Just food for thought.
2007-01-26 17:30:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Puck 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there's no longer an actual date. If evolution is an sluggish upward circulate, then the fall of the Roman empire could be defined as a devolutionary industry. while did WWII start up? the U. S. marks December 7, 1941, yet conflict grew to become into raging in Europe and different factors of the Pacific long until eventually now that. Or, the date for the commencing up of the melancholy is unknown. the fall of the inventory industry, grew to become into only a bump on the line in direction of a breakdown of the international financial gadget. All that to assert, there's no given date. existence did no longer exchange for the popular Roman from on day to the subsequent, yet a Roman might observe exchange over his lifetime.
2016-09-28 01:07:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by zeitz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
talk about poetic license.
you can make comparisons to history all you like but the only thing like the Roman empire was the Roman empire.
You can scream Vietnam about the war in Iraq, it doesn't make it Vietnam.
You can compare Bush to Hitler, it doesn't make him Hitler.
The only people who don't care about about the war are the people too concerned about what Paris Hilton is wearing to the bar tonight.
I agree with you to a small level. I believe we are too self involved in our own personal dramas to see the world picture, but I am doubtful we are headed down the slippery slope to oblivion, well at least not yet.
If you would like to use Rome as a comparison then let me remind you that for centuries people said the same about Rome, To big, to ruthless, to indulgent. They said it from the time of Caesar, to Octavius, to Augustus and on and on and on... The empire did not collapse.
It only collapsed when the government became weak willed and was no longer willing or able to protect it's self.
Even Nero was not the end of the Empire.
If you want to use Rome as a reference point to the US, then you should show how the failure of the people to support the government (right or wrong), or to fight for their homes and beliefs is what doomed the Empire.
2007-01-26 14:42:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stone K 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No it isnt, theres nothing in comparison if you check out the histories of both.
Different peoples, only maybe the choice or styles of picking languages were the same, and that was for biblical reason in the making I believe.
My ? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjsmYKfwAd5Ry1qP1xtQMyfsy6IX?qid=20070126183051AArC80D
2007-01-26 13:57:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Phlow 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Technically, no. You have to realize, the Roman empire had a period of enlightenment before it completely crumbled. America, if it is close to crumbling, didn't.
2007-01-26 15:22:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by bishonenofcacophony 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes I believe so.
2007-01-26 13:58:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
sooo the drama
well, dude, I am sorry to say, I agree
Christians like myself have been saying that the US is a ticking time bomb
2007-01-26 16:37:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by firechap20 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
exactly the same. its the sequel.
2007-01-26 14:43:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by roulis 2
·
0⤊
2⤋