What scientific studies should be conducted?

Question

I was thinking about all these studies that "educated professionals" conduct in the US, and it occurred to me that so many of them are nothing but a waste of money. Taxpayer's money, no less.
Come on. Who with common sense needs a study to understand that the majority of accidents occur at home, a place where you spend 3/4 of your day?
Or that it would cost 10 million dollars to map the genetics of a tree?
Go figure that the people most likely to be in an automobile accident JUST SO HAPPEN to be young males, that everyone knows think they're virtually immortal anyway.
Or, how about, studies that tell us how these studies are a waste of money? Isn't that just a LITTLE hypocritical?

So, my final question is, shouldn't US citizens be allowed to vote on what studies their money is blown on? Maybe something a little more useful than the danger of kitchen knives?

Answer 1

I don't think we should vote on which studies to fund. We should just stop funding them. No where in the US constitution is the government authorized to fund any of them. If they are so valuable, why don't private organizations fund them?

Answer 2

I believe scientific studies should be conducted on Ted Kennedy's liver

The potential data gained for science could be groundbreaking.

Answer 3

lovable (inspite of the incontrovertible fact that faux) analogy. Your past analogy was once drawing parallels between the teenager form of an intensive species, to the guy form of an intensive species. then you definately attempt to equivocate this to human babies to the profession of their mom and pa. >further learn shows, that for the period of contrast to each and each distinctive animal, they infrequently ever grew as much as be what their known wish was once. no longer least puzzling that, inspite of the incontrovertible fact that the "animals" you listed in the 1st area of your analogy do no longer extremely specific conscious needs for distinctive professions, do they?