be honest
2007-01-26 12:08:09 · 17 answers · asked by trippydee 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Just thinking of what world peace would mean for EVERYONE is such an emotional thing! This is a no-brainer. We would all be so much richer in so many ways. And that includes money.
2007-01-26 12:20:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only World peace
2007-01-26 12:14:04 · answer #2 · answered by manasranjan d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple, if you had 50 million just out of the blue like that you wouldn't have a lot of peace in your world. Example, you would start getting a lot of strange phone calls and occasionally you would have someone you've never met walk up to you and tell you long tales of how they're your grand dad's brother's nephew's first cousin's step son's adopted dog's relative. Just saying, it happens.
So, I'll stick with world peace
2007-01-26 12:44:45 · answer #3 · answered by Zhughu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
world peace because world peace will last us forever money will come and money will golets say u get a really good job and so u make a lot of money mabe you'll earn 50 million u cant buy world peace so if you could have world peace take it
2007-01-26 16:15:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In response to that guy who said that World Peace would ruin innovative technological development.... WHAT?
With the world at peace, EVERY country would come together on new ideas for making the human existence more complete! Instead of spending billions making spy satellites and super stealth rockets, we could be spending billions on schools and finding a cure to Cancer.
:o)
I would pick World Peace.
2007-01-26 12:29:04 · answer #5 · answered by I Ain't Your Momma 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
$50 million dollars. World peace can only happen for milliseconds before it's broken....$50 million dollars can last for my life (and beyond).
Plus really cool technology/innovation comes out of an unstable world. In a stable world, we'd have little need for advanced research and topping each other on a big scale (like space colonization). We wouldn't have supersonic flight, the internet (it started as a DARPA project), many of our most powerful super computers, we wouldn't have gone to the moon, have a global GPS system, many of our medical devices, the field of aerodynamics would not be anywhere near as far, same with autonomous robotics...
2007-01-26 12:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by contemplating 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmm... I could help myself or help the billions of people in the world. Let me think............... World Peace Duh!!!
You would have to be one selfish person to say 50 million dollars instead of world peace.
2007-01-26 12:17:56 · answer #7 · answered by LALALALALALALA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly....
I would definately take world peace only because 1) its the right thing 2) i would probably have 2 pay tax on the money anyway(JK) 3) All of the bad things i want to end 4)im not greedy 5)world peace is something i could be proud of and live on for ever
"??????, the man who created world peace back in 2007"
2007-01-26 12:17:41 · answer #8 · answered by Miguel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
World peace, just for something different. We've done the money hungry method for centuries now and it doesn't work. I'd like to see what would happen with world peace.
2007-01-26 12:32:06 · answer #9 · answered by q 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50 million dollars because there will never be world peace beacuse everyone is diffrent and someone will always disagree
2007-01-26 15:08:36 · answer #10 · answered by lyra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋