2007-01-26 10:47:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, indeed. Here's proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8yp5Gpo3G4
2007-01-26 10:52:16 · answer #1 · answered by notyou311 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
No its not the Pres.that has made this nation more vulnerable,its the gutless cowards in congress who are more concerned with their own careers and party than the welfare of America.Give them a little more time and they will destroy this nation!
2007-01-26 20:01:13 · answer #2 · answered by Streakin' Deacon 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, absolutely not. It is not a coincidence and it is sure as hell not because of the democrats that we have not had an attack in the U.S. since 9/11. There is a reason it is called public opinion...opinions are not based on facts and are oftentimes wrong. The Constitution makes the President the Commander-in-Chief for a reason...the President is in the best position to make decisions regarding the defense of this country. The Congress is just a bunch of whiners who only care about getting elected for another term. Anyone that cannot see this President has the integrity and intentions to protect this country is blinded by their ignorance, hate and party politics.
2007-01-26 19:08:04 · answer #3 · answered by griffon1426 3 · 1⤊ 7⤋
Absolutely positively YES
2007-01-26 18:53:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
No. Fighting back against those who attack us can't make us weaker or more vulnerable.
2007-01-26 18:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
No question about it!
2007-01-26 18:54:26 · answer #6 · answered by Nikolas S 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
No I don't. I think he's trying to do the best he can to protect us.
2007-01-26 18:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2⤊ 8⤋
well we certainly dont want to become isolationists again, so no.
2007-01-26 18:59:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋