Now usually I hate Clemson, I'm a South Carolina fan, but I hate Duke even more. It disgusted me to see the end of that game. Clemson played brilliantly to come back and it was all taken away because apparently when the Clemson player caught McRoberts poor pass in, pump faked, and then shot the three to tie, it only took .6 seconds. The clock should have been at about 2 seconds left which would have forcced to Duke to pretty much shoot a half court shot. And like the ACC apologizing for the mistake. Apologizing doesnt make up for that kinda thing. I cant imagine how bad the Clemson players must feel.
2007-01-26 15:13:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The game should have gone to overtime, so clemson got robbed of a chance to win but you never know the Blue Devils might have won anyways in overtime
2007-01-26 18:16:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ben F. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.clemson didnt come close to getting robbed.Duke was leading basically the whole game if not the whole game and Clemson slowly creaped back.Duke almost got robbed.
2007-01-26 19:03:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope
clemson should have had better defense
that shot was slick
duke just had a pure win
2007-01-26 22:28:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by afmooseluvrx3 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Dukies might have won in o t...but, it should have gone to o t. The zebras should never decide the outcome in a flagrant fashion.
2007-01-26 18:43:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by homerunhitter 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, duke still would've won in OT anyway
2007-01-26 18:18:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beast8981 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No
2007-01-26 18:17:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋