And why? Expand people, expand?
2007-01-26 09:46:15 · 10 answers · asked by **brainy licious**J;-D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I would like the rights I have to be enforced by my government. I do not like to have to debate the issue of firearm ownership each time a republican is not in office. I do not like to have to try to get freedom of religion, not just freedom from religion enforced.
How about an amendment that reminds the leadership that constitutional rights are natural rights that are not subject to casual debate.
2007-01-26 10:06:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
First off lets look at the the word amendment, "which by definition means to alter or change." The constitutions is actually subject to change.
I believe that corruption actually fuels a government, such as watching two car dealers haggle over a customer with great buying power. Put two or three of these people in the office at the same time and god only knows that your going to get less minute crap solved, but the things that matter most are going to flurish, be worked out and finally be puut into action! Just a kind thought!
2007-01-26 10:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by chapman_red 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The right to hold a new presidential election if the people of the USA (who really are the "great deciders') deem it necessary to get rid of a corrupt and despotic president (like Bush).
Why? Because it'll make them do what the people want them to do, or at least a bit more likely.
2007-01-26 09:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think its fine the way it is. Fiddling with the constitution is not something taken lightly.
About the only think I would suggest is clarifying certain rights outlined in the constitution but that's ripe for trouble too-- e.g. 2nd amendment.
2007-01-26 10:05:12 · answer #4 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why talk about adding rights when the ones that are there are being ignored more and more. The democrats want to reimpose the fairness doctrine which would put an end to free speech in the polictical arena. It scares me to see religiuos freedom going down the drain, oh if your muslim or buddist or whatever, say whatever you want but if your Christian, shut up. Someone tell me how thats freedom of religon or speech.
2007-01-26 09:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by me45404 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
"These statutes should not be revised so as to deny any citizen these aforementioned rights, not even in times of crisis so as to prevent a policed nation state. It is the right of this docment to secure all liberties for all citizens at all costs."
2007-01-26 11:31:13 · answer #6 · answered by AM 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The right of the people to have a no confidence vote to remove the President.
2007-01-26 10:05:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
The right to introduce legally obtained evidence that the police acted in good faith getting instead of some guy getting paid 100s of dollars an hour by drug dealers getting it thrown out.
2007-01-26 09:57:33 · answer #8 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Instead of a right, what about adding a few responsibilities? That might make a difference.
2007-01-26 09:53:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am on board with the first guy.....let us talk about responsibilities. Like, parents have the RIGHT to financially and ethically care for their children. Parents have the RIGHT to respect and in other ways proper to care for their children.
2007-01-26 10:01:17 · answer #10 · answered by rrrevils 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋