Hillary for pres.. and obama for vice pres...
a white woman and a black man running the country....
MLK will be so proud !!!!!
they have my vote if they choose to work together !!!!
Lets make 08 the year that all racist and sexist scum realize their worst nightmare !!!! LOLOLOLOL
2007-01-26 09:34:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Common Sense 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
I think both have strengths and weaknesses. Obama is unqualified. He hasn't served long enough in my opinion, and I prefer some executive experience. On the plus side, he;s extremely bright, has a vision, and is VERY charismatic. Hilary is very qualified, but she cost this nation a health care program. She handled it VERY badly, and that to me is a HUGE strike. I also dislike her support of our Iraq policy. Her big advantage is that she'll have the money behind her. I can also say that I feel nostalgia for having a Clinton in office.
Honestly I think the Democrats with the best chance to win are Richardson and Edwards. Richardson is the more qualified, but I think Edwards has the best chance to win and unite the nation. I don't think Barak or Hillary really has earned a nomination.
As far as Barak being qualified though, only three Presidents in the last 50 years were trully qualified to hold the position in my opinion (LBJ, Nixon, Bush Sr.), and all of those three certainly made many mistakes. I think you clearly saw how much Bush Lite's inexperience and lack of qualifications impacted his Presidency. Clinton made a lot of errors, especially early, from being overwhelmed as well. Unlike Bush, Clinton learned from his.
No matter what happens, I feel confident that we will have a better executive then what we have now. I don't agree with most of Mcain's positions, but the man is at least competent and admirable. He's a qualified presidential candidate. I can at least respect him. I at least trust Mcain to do what is in the interest of the majority of our nation. I don't trust Bush to do that.
1 week ago - Report Abuse
2007-01-26 17:37:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I have to go with Hillary. She has experience in politics.
She has knowledge of what the job entails and knows her way around. She's very intelligent. Since she is married to Bill I'd say she is open minded.
Obama has a great smile. I would guess him to be a smart man. I do not think that qualifies him to be the
President. Brad Pitt has a great smile, he's smart, but I would'nt vote for him either.
2007-01-26 17:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by gijohnny 1
·
3⤊
3⤋
Obama. I like that he is not an "experienced" politician, it is long past time for fresh faces and outlooks in Washington. I also like his youth, it is time for yesterday's generation to step aside and let tomorrow's take charge. He is intelligent and seems to have a vision for the future.
Clinton is a carpet -bagger politician and slickster lawyer, and the additional baggage of her philandering husband make her a totally unattractive choice. She has done nothing of significance in her term in the Senate, and her forays into policy making during her husband's twin terms as president were nothing short of disasterous.
2007-01-26 18:35:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by John B 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Definitely not HILLARY or OBAMA he is not qualified and we had enough of her when Bill was president!!!!! We will have to wait and see who runs!!!!
2007-01-26 19:48:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by d3midway semi-retired 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
personally i prefer Obama, he seems more down to earth, And his policies are very open minded. Hillary has lots of experience and i think she would do well as well, but if i had to choose between i would say obama
2007-01-26 17:31:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by raztis 3
·
4⤊
4⤋
hillary, because I get two for one.
2007-01-27 03:29:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Niether
2007-01-26 17:32:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by me45404 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
hillary!!!!!! i think its time for us woman to get the power. she can't screw us any more than bush! besides obama sounds like someone who we should be bombing. i don't get into all of the politics, but i think she really does deserve it. her husband was a good president but a bad husband. i think he should be the new first lady. but thats just me
2007-01-26 17:35:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by starburst 1
·
1⤊
6⤋
Neither...they are both morons that don't have the guts it takes to defend our nation or the intelligence to run it...it would be great if Condoleeza would run, though!
2007-01-26 17:33:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by tx girl 3
·
2⤊
5⤋