Bill ignored intelligence and refused to kill Bin Laden when given a chance. 59 Americans were killed by Bin Laden during Clinton's watch and many more in the attacks planned while he was president just after he left office. Intelligence show that he let al Qaeda get much more powerful and now even in Sudan who gave him intelligence many are being killed by Islamofacism. Do you think against the war Hillary will protect us or allow al Qaeda to again regain enough power to strike us again which they have sworn to do?
For more info:
http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory091103b.asp
2007-01-26 09:16:13 · 17 answers · asked by beek 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Finally someone who is asking an intelligent question.
Hillary will withdraw our troops and Al-qaeda will take over iraq and we will have World War III when we have to go back and complete that job that hillary will mess up.
Let's elect her and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-01-26 10:13:15 · answer #1 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clinton didn't ignore bin Laden at all - in fact he was the first president to devote any significant amount of energy to anti-terrorism. It was the Republican congress that was complaining about Clinton's bombing of the targets given to him by the government of Sudan (turned out to be a bogus tip, but he took action on it right away - and ended up hitting a milk factory with a cruise missile). "WAG THE DOG" they all shouted... Clinton was demonized for every military action he ever took. After the "black hawk down" incident it was the Republicans that were calling for the IMMEDIATE withdrawal of US troops - it was Clinton that resisted them.
When the Bushies arrived they complained about the people from the Clinton administration being "obsessed" with Osama bin Laden.... If only the Bushies had shown the same level of obsession, maybe we wouldn't have been taken by suprise on Sept. 11, 2001.
Clinton captured and imprisoned the people behind the first WTC bombing, and the only reason he didn't do more after the Cole bombing was because he was about to leave office.
Why do you lie and distort recent history in order to demonize the best President of my lifetime?
2007-01-26 09:28:09 · answer #2 · answered by brooks b 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And 3000 were killed by bin Laden on George's watch. 4 years of war against Al-Qaida and we are no closer to catching Osama bin Laden than we were before. Who cares what Hillary Clinton will do. She isn't president. George W Bush is though.
Stop blaming the Clintons for Bush's screw ups.
2007-01-26 09:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Clinton was not aware that there will be a 9/11 because of ignored Osama at that time. come on, why would a president let go any terrorist ? Don't forget USA has been helping afghan fighters to fight against USSR. And, why there is chaos for Hillary , she will be just another president thats it !! no good no bad.
2007-01-26 09:32:09 · answer #4 · answered by james 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Haven't you been reading your memos? You're not supposed to mention Bin Laden anymore. The only terrorists are in Iraq, remember? Now follow the rest of the lemmings to this pretty cliff. . .
2007-01-26 09:40:37 · answer #5 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, IF she gains presidency, she will have him isolated in not a prison for life, but in some desolate place. She probably won't kill him immediately. Bush would do that. I'm interested in what Barack Obama would do if they found Bin Laden. Oh yeah, and though I'm a democrat, please don't wish doom on Bush. If it happens, Cheney will get to replace him and no one wants that. (p.s. Great question!)
2007-01-26 09:37:58 · answer #6 · answered by I 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the attacks happened on 9-11 on Bush's watch because he didn't listen to advice and he wasn't prepared to do his job in protecting America.
2007-01-26 09:23:42 · answer #7 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
59 Americans killed during the clinton era....3,000 Americans and countless Iraqi civilians died under the Bush era. Jeez, I wonder whose worst?
Gotcha!
2007-01-26 09:25:32 · answer #8 · answered by GOP - Going Out of Power 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This question is so full of holes and *truths I don't know where to begin.
2007-01-26 09:34:18 · answer #9 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Bush hasn't exactly had much luck tracking him down either huh?
2007-01-26 09:26:02 · answer #10 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋