English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've just seen and advert for Neutrogena handcream and it said, now available in fast absorbing handcream. I couldn't help but wonder who would therefore prefer to buy the not-so-fast absorbing handcream. Tell me, would you prefer to be able to moisturise your hands and get on with your life, or moisturise your hands a wait for 4 hours whilst they dry?

2007-01-26 08:50:37 · 5 answers · asked by Rachael H 5 in Beauty & Style Makeup

5 answers

I`m a big hairy builder type and this time of year working outside we are prone to "splits" on our hands, any little cut etc just dries up and the hard skin forms around it and it just stays an open wound, I use neutrogena which solves this problem (softening the skin and letting it heal), I saw the ad like you and bought some and to be honest the fast absorbing stuff isn`t nearly as good for my purpose.

2007-01-26 09:24:30 · answer #1 · answered by OhSimonsBinDrinkin 4 · 0 0

Moisturisers which dry straight away are probably not as moisturising as a moisturiser which would take 4 hours to dry! My hands get really dry so i need a good moisturiser, but i only use it at night before i go to bed so it has time to absorb properly!

2007-01-26 10:48:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have tried many hand creams but the best I found was Moisture Mitts by Bee-Luscious cosmetics you can look it up on beeroyalproducts.com web site its worth it

2007-01-26 09:23:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Very good question - there nothing worse that greasy handcream that just won't sink in...........

2007-01-26 08:57:01 · answer #4 · answered by Bexs 5 · 0 0

Just get on with life and don't buy rubbish products.

2007-01-26 08:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers