If you learned today that, if you had been aborted as a fetus, your pre-life/early life material would have been responsible through Stem Cell Research for saving millions of lives, improving millions of lives, curing cancer, repairing spinal cord damage, reversing Alzheimer's, or helping massive burn victims ... And if you could go back in time, would you CHOOSE to be aborted and used for that purpose?
2007-01-26 08:45:18 · 8 answers · asked by Answer Flop 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
NO
2007-01-26 11:07:04 · answer #1 · answered by cherry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now that is a huge stretch.
I personally am pro life and pro choice.
I am very much against using stem cells from fetuses or inseminate eggs for the use of science.
I am all for stem cell research. But, we need to use the stem cells that arn't made just for that purpose. Stem cells can be harvested from a variety of other places.
Lets keep abortion away from this. There needs to be a line drawn where all people can agree otherwise this stem cell thing will divide people who need to be working together.
2007-01-26 18:07:40 · answer #2 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Asking a person to try to imagine their non-existance is pretty hard, dude. Even when trying to fathom the death of our life hear on the planet. Your question really makes no sense because it obviously has a political bent.
2007-01-26 17:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Embryo - not fetus. Anyway soon it won't be necessary to use embryos for stem cells.
2007-01-26 17:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by thievesstolemypolicecar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't believe in the use of stem cells for any purpose. And I don't believe in abortion.
2007-01-26 17:04:30 · answer #5 · answered by Judith 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO.... Your question didn't even make me think for 2 seconds.
2007-01-26 18:52:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-01-26 16:59:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all.......
2007-01-26 17:00:03 · answer #8 · answered by free 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋