This is a serious question.
And do you not find it ironic that it took a scoundrel to even make the bid for a female president a possibility?
2007-01-26 07:43:38 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes I believe so
2007-01-26 07:50:42 · answer #1 · answered by ♥PinkIce♥ 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Consider that she has the experience of that office already and still wants to apply for the job. This could be the best (most voter turn-out) election ever!
It's hard to consider this a serious question when you've already voiced a cynical viewpoint. Does that mean I'm supposed to agree with you? or are you welcoming other views as well?
2007-01-26 08:13:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can not believe that US will live with a precedent worse than Bush.Therefore Hilary Clinton will be better than Bush ,but how much better by 10% or 50% or ? Only God knows!
2007-01-26 08:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nobody - but nobody - could be worse than George Bush. That is a total impossibility. And with a female now a possibility, maybe its a sign that as a nation, we're finally growing up and realizing that women can do just as well as men. Its about damn time!! By the way, you're being kind referring to Bush as a scoundrel.
Hillary in '08
2007-01-26 07:54:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It took a scoundrel to make the bid possible? That's true. Where would Hillary be if she wasn't Bill's wife. She and Obama are both running on platforms of celebrity status. What have either of them done?
2007-01-26 07:51:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
At least George Bush loves the USA. Hillary wants to outsource our jobs, broaden government control ie; health care, salary caps , government ran schools (only), take from the working and give it to the non- working ("for the common good"-- that same statement is being parroted by other Dem's too) ---- So you decide, are you into socialism or freedom... There is your answer..
2007-01-26 07:57:12 · answer #6 · answered by bereal1 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
you cherished Clinton?! ok, Im quite particular in case you call the phsychyatrists workplace and tell them its an emergency, they receives you an appointment. Do it now, in the previous its to previous due. Bush had various of fantastic concepts, yet no longer the backing to help his plans. He didnt imagine by ability of those significant judgements. also, do not forget that he were given our usa by ability of its toughest time in view that Pearl Harbor. I didnt see you up there, making speaches to augment the moral of u.s.. I didnt see you pulling this usa out of its darkest hour in generations. So dont criticize him, until eventually you're keen to do what he did.
2016-10-16 03:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she would be a far better president than George W. Bush, however I'm not sure 100% sure that she is the Best candidate yet.
I wouldn't necessarily say that it's ironic, we have come a long way and I think US citizens are taking our situation far more seriously than before and we're finally realizing that we are in deep ****. We need someone to get us out of it, she's been there.. she knows what it's like.. perhaps she could be the one to point our country in a better direction?
2007-01-26 07:51:55 · answer #8 · answered by x__brand_new 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
She would be an uglier president than President Bush
2007-01-26 10:08:03 · answer #9 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look how long it took Bush to fix this country after the first Clinton. Putting another in office would irrevocably screw our nation up! I think Hilary is dumber than her husband. I'm all for a woman in office, if it's an intelligent one like Condoleeza!
2007-01-26 07:52:10 · answer #10 · answered by tx girl 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Rotten would destroy this country within six months. She can't even run her own life and family. How in the hell is she going to run the country? She is pure evil.
2007-01-26 08:51:10 · answer #11 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋