2007-01-26 07:33:38 · 9 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would seem that is his intent.
2007-01-26 07:56:02 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love the thick bias in your question.
It's not IRAN (who has threatened Isreal with destruction, ignored the UN, building nukes, etc.) who is antagonizing others.
It is W. who is antagonizing the Iranians!
What an inverted sense of reality some people have.
2007-01-26 15:43:25 · answer #2 · answered by C = JD 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Looks like there os a group trying to push US into war with Iran (and towards Armaggedon because they're tired of God's Curse???)... and at the expense of the American People! If they believe they're being pointed out to suffer on Earth, they might as well bring/drag along others to suffer with them!
2007-01-26 15:59:22 · answer #3 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the Bush Preemptive attack doctrine he doesn't need to be antagonized
2007-01-26 16:01:35 · answer #4 · answered by Rja 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He shouldn't, but he probably will. Sometimes it's good to let some dogs lie on the porch. Iran is one of those "dogs." The United States cannot support opening another front with this war.
2007-01-26 15:42:41 · answer #5 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hey, that is one of the few things I like about Bush.
Iran sucks like a vacuum cleaner.
2007-01-26 15:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Wouldn't surprise me one bit..
His provoking of wars isn't uncommon..
Maybe this time he'll be smart enough to have a plan...BEFORE...sending in troops..
2007-01-26 15:41:35 · answer #7 · answered by Michael 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I doubt that very much.
2007-01-26 15:55:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He sure will.
2007-01-26 15:42:42 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋