Don't you think this question might be better served if asked after the primary season in the spring...OF NEXT YEAR? Why don't we all try getting to know a candidate before we blurt out some name of someone we know very little about but who the press has been running stories on. There's a freaking idea, learn about the person you are voting for and maybe, just maybe we can put someone with some sort of leadership skills and intelligence into the oval office. Just a suggestion, no need to listen to me though. Go on making stupid choices of whomever the press tells you to vote for. Thanks and have a nice day.
2007-01-26 06:57:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
At this point, none of the candidates. All of the Senators who have announced and were in the Senate at the time of the Use of Armed Force in Iraq Resolution voted for it. All but John McCain have flip-flopped on the war since the mid-term elections. Barak Obama is a bit short on experience, and I am not familiar with many of the others.
2007-02-02 11:19:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lynn W 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
before everything do your learn how to locate the party that "truthfully" represents your way of thinking. greater often than no longer, Republicans have self assurance in decrease taxes (even no count if it extremely is for the wealthy), much less government (yet it may be difficult pressed to coach it at present) and construction usa via being company friendly. Democrats greater often than no longer, have self assurance greater in guy or woman rights (each and every so often on the price of maximum individuals), taxing the firms and giving the breaks to the guy. Republicans are commonly greater conservative (professional existence, constitutional modification defining marriage), Democrats greater liberal (professional decision, gay rights, stem cellular learn) Being an clever guy or woman you will desire to look into applicants, no longer basically the favored ones. And in case you have the time artwork to assist the single you suspect in. Get your sources from greater desirable than one venue. FOX information is amazingly professional Republican, ABC information slightly much less professional Democrat. yet take each and every thing that's mentioned with a grain of salt, learn their balloting historic past, no longer basically what they are saying. Their significant purpose outstanding now could be to get helps, and financial backing to be the single to get the nomination from their party. permit's settle for it, however Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and John Anderson can run as Independents out of the main bypass events, the superb probability for victory is with one in each and every of the two significant events. solid success mutually with your decision and welcome to the circus!
2016-12-16 14:14:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either the Republican, Democrat, or qualified independent. Otherwise, whomever received nomination or runs indepently. Now, for the primaries, John Edwards and John McCain.
2007-01-26 06:52:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't nor would I support any of the Democrats. Obama and Richardson have almost no chance, then there's Hillary Clinton. I think we've had enough Clinton's in the White House for one millennium.
As For the Republicans I would vote for John McCain.
2007-01-26 06:50:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by evil_paul 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
The chances are that none of the frontrunners today will be on the ballot on November 4, 2008.
2007-01-26 07:01:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary
2007-02-02 03:27:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by sally sue 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Gore, Clinton, Obama, Kucinich, Edwards, Richardson, Boxer--the Democrats have a lot of really good people out there.
2007-02-02 13:15:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
John Ewards
2007-01-31 02:51:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by cwigg 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Al Keda- Independent canidate from New York
2007-01-26 06:53:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chazz Drizzler 5
·
0⤊
1⤋