English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

keep in mind that vince foster was murdered and not a thing was done about it. i happen to know that if she is elected then it will be the death of the nation. the eu and other such countries, muslims, will be allowed to come over and start having their way. we will lose our indentity as americans and all the men that fought and died for this country will be for nothing.

2007-01-26 06:35:54 · 19 answers · asked by vern7us 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

Good Lord NO!!! Just the thought gives me the creeps - surely the American public won't be stupid enough to put that horrid woman in the White House! And Bill is going to be the moral compass for her presidency? Give me a break - talk about disfunctional!

2007-01-26 06:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by woodlands127 5 · 1 6

Personally I would want no democrats to be elected. However I think that for some reason the american public thinks that Iraq is a disaster and that only the democrats can save them. What they fail to see is that by seeking allies from a threat that doesn't exist they are playing right into their own distruction. So to answer your question no although she may be the lesser of the other evils. There are many reasons which I will get into. Bare in mind that this applies to all of the democrats.

First and foremost she will pull us out of Iraq like the other democrats would. This would cause the region to spiral out of control easily and Iran will gain almost complete control over the region. Second she and the other socialists are obsessed with illegal immigrants. The fact is that although there are a couple of exceptions, by and large they have a negative effect on our economy and they commit way, way, way more crimes than citizens do. Why should they obey the law when they didn't in order to get in? Third, she and the other dems think that socializing medicine is the way to go. The dems don't seem to get that this will cause our defict to increase rapidly. It would also cause the quility of healthcare to sharply drop. Forth, she and the other dems would raise taxes, a lot, causing the economy to suffer, a lot. Regardless of what you have heard from the media the economy is actually doing better than it was. Bush's tax cuts were actually too small according to some nobel laurettes. Fifth, she is a women. As bad as that sounds the president has to appear before the world, not just their own country. The sad fact is that many countries won't listen to a women president. This causes a great loss in power.

There are many other reasons why I believe Hillary and other dems aren't fit to be president. Not just dems but some republicans like McCain are complete jokes. So I guess when it comes to it you will have to chose the lesser of two evils. So even though I believe Hillary shouldn't be president but I think that she might be better than spinless McCain and evil Obama. Personally I trust what may be going through that man's head. The speed at which he has risen to power and the idiocy of his idea are terrifying. Well anyway that is my two cents.

2007-01-26 07:09:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

that is a very sexist way to look at thing! you don't know that's how the country would be!! look at the way it is with bush running it!! health care is ridicualous, college is not at all affordable for middle class people like myself, there are problems with shcooling, and then there's the war!!!!!! over 300,000 soldiers have died in iraq alone, that's not even including the number that have died in Afghanistan!! i'd rather have the EU (which fyi is not a country, it's a groupo of countries) take over than be in a war that can't be won. and by what basis do you think that the "EU and muslims will be allowed to come over and start having their way" what makes you think that. other than the obvious fact from your tone that you don't think a woman can do a good job running this country. it is time for a chnage in the way this country is run, and why not have a woman who knows the working of the government and white house intimately be the one to do it. i think you're just sexist.

2007-01-26 07:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by Duelen 4 · 1 1

No, but not for the reasons you mention, which are just plain idiotic. Hillary shouldn't be elected because she's part of a Democratic movement that has no grand vision to move the country forward. She's too much a part of the apparatus.

And, doesn't she seem sort of like an angry - seething type of person? I'm not sure I want her to have the nuke codes and the red phone on her desk.

I think Obama, Fiengold and Edwards would all be better. And, it has nothing to do with their reproductive equipment.

The fact that Hillary was General Counsel at Wal Mart makes me very nervous.

2007-01-26 06:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by Murphy 3 · 2 2

I wouldn't like to see Hillary get past the primaries, and NOT because of the ridiculous rightwing rhetoric in your question description but because I don't like her weak stance on alternative energy, the environment, and other domestic issues.

I don't think that the election of Hillary Clinton would allow the EU and Muslims to "have their way" (whatever that means), I just don't think that she would work for my own interests or the interests of the majority of American people. I feel the same way about the current Republican candidates that have entered the race.

2007-01-26 06:45:55 · answer #5 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 3 2

it incredibly is how Bush have been given into workplace. the two circumstances. Its the Republican administration we've that scares me. it may well be great for usa if e had a much bigger majority of Democrats in workplace and a Democratic president. extra people income on Democratic regulations, its a actuality. The Republicans basically signify the great wealthy.

2016-11-01 08:50:27 · answer #6 · answered by nocera 4 · 0 0

Ah, I thought this was an honest question looking for simple answers, but instead it led to more b.s. about something that was never proven. Riddle me this Batman. All these horrible crimes the Clintons have supposedly committed? After eight years (and longer) of the Republicans who hate(d) them trying to get evidence on all of the accusations, they finally just had to settle for Bill's impeachment for lying under oath. Nothing else ever panned out, why was that? My, if the Clintons are that smart and powerful that they were able to completely wipe out evidence, silence everyone who had credible information, and defeat the huge effort that Republicans made to paint them as murderous criminals, what does that say about the intelligence of Republicans? Just wondering... Because these days these lame throwbacks to old scandals are about as credible as Bush's continuing to link 9/11 and Iraq.

2007-01-26 06:48:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I agree, I also know of a person who died under mysterious conditions who was, not only a personal banker, but a personal friend of the Clinton's. You didn't hear anything about it on the national news because he wasn't a huge political figure. He was however my step-brother, and his wife was an almost weekly visitor to the white house to see Hillary. He died shortly after all the White Water information started coming to light. He was one of the investors/bankers that was involved and knew a lot about some very powerful people.

2007-01-26 06:47:35 · answer #8 · answered by Scooter Girl 4 · 1 3

You say," We will lose our identity as americans,,,,,,,WHAT IDENTITY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!! GOOD OR BAD??? How does the world now look at America?? Does she protrayed a good image to the WHOLE WORLD?? Let us take a moment to reflect what you said. "SHOULD HILLARY GET ELECTED"?? This is your upmost civic and social responsibility and the rest of your countrymen and women to think seriously and carefully. Nobody will tell you how to elect your own president. WILL IT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE TO YOU IF HILLARY IS VOTED IN?? OR SOMEONE ELSE?? WHOEVER YOU VOTED IN --PRAY TO GOD THAT he OR she WILL NOT BE THE PERSON TO INITIATE THE THIRD WORLD WAR?? THAT THIS person COMES TO RESTORE TRUE PEACE AND HARMONY to all nations--- and not just faking it!!! The voters have just as much to be blamed in supporting a president who MIGHT be a war-lord and NOT A PEACE SOLVER!!!!! So, BE VERY DISCERNING AND PRAY TO GOD TO GUIDE ALL AMERICANS TO CHOOSE A VERY GOOD PRESIDENT FOR YOUR COUNTRY!!! We will start a PRAYER VIGIL in our own country to pray for America and for all americans !!! GOD BLESSES ALL NATIONS IN THE WORLD AND PEACE SHALL PREVAIL FOR ALL MANKIND!! This is my prayer and I hope yours too!!!!

2007-01-26 07:30:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would vote for her, her husband was the best president of my time. She had something to do with that. Bill would be known as the "1st Man", that would be neet. What if America needed a female President all along? Its not a bad idea while heading into a more peaceful gloabalized era.

2007-01-26 06:56:06 · answer #10 · answered by graphix 5 · 4 1

I've been hearing about the Clinton's murdering Foster for years and it's bullsh!t. If you have proof then put it on the table.

The rest of the question is nothing but biased conjecture.

2007-01-26 07:07:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers