taking into consideration that 2 paedophiles were also set free because our prisons are full.
2007-01-26 06:14:30 · 7 answers · asked by Hipira 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Renee, I'm comparing the sentences, not the crimes. I'm asking you if the judges/the government got it right! The woman actually said in her interview that those "dying people" have got a right to pain relief and I agree. Read the question!
2007-01-26 06:28:26 · update #1
Setting a criminal free due to "full" prisons, is itself a crime.
Build enough spaces to accommodate them, THEN set GOOD decent laws for all.
Supplying drugs does qualify for a prison sentence,
BUT catering for MS sufferers COULD be treated as selling medicine, NOT drugs.
2007-01-26 06:42:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You would be surprised on the large sentences given out for the smaller crimes, and vice versa. You have given a great example. Even if people don't want to admit it, these things happen every day and it's not fair.
There are people in prison who violated probation because they fought back from someone in self defense, or got pulled over by the police for a taillight being out. These are probation violations...not even lawbreaking rules. in NH there are 48% of inmates in prison for probation violations.
Many people in prison want to get out and straighten out their lives and be law abiding productive members of society again, and many are good people who made bad mistakes. One of the areas people over-look is prison's transitional and vocational programs.
If they changed the way they currently manage these programs and beefed them up, people would less likely go BACK to the way they were because they now have new independent living skills to work with to be able to live a life.
But we do need laws and consequences if people break the laws. However, I feel they should try to match the punishment to fit the crime.
2007-01-26 07:29:22 · answer #2 · answered by Erica, AKA Stretch 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, she got a suspended sentance, that means she's not in jail and two, the paedophiles were not set free, they have to return to court at a later date for sentancing.
personally i think that cannabis SHOULD be available for people with diseases such as MS, but the woman DID know what she was doing. and knew it was illegal.
And the other well, i think that paedolphiles shouldn't be in prison, they should be shot/hanged/stoned/ got rid off - disgusting perverts that they are
2007-01-26 06:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by merciasounds 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So you're comparing a medical marijuana user, which is essentially an herbalist, to a person who sexually abuses little children and scars them for life. Get your head out of the sand. Your ad hominem arguments don't work on intelligent people. It's wrong for the courts to free a pedofile and right for them to suspend the sentence of the herbalist.
2007-01-26 06:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
At lots of the gatherings i've got been to at Muslims' residences, the lads and ladies individuals stay in separate rooms. they might see one yet another on the time while dinner is served, yet they in many situations consume in separate rooms, too. all of the adult males in one, all of the ladies individuals in yet another. I *****, because of the fact in many situations the only people i comprehend are my husband and sons, and that i could elect to be interior a similar room as them. yet i'm no longer a Muslim. i've got under no circumstances heard any Muslims ***** approximately it. .
2016-11-27 20:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the laws an a ss/ a rse whatever all the same
2007-01-26 06:24:34 · answer #6 · answered by valda54 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It's illegal. What's the point of laws if everyone can do what they want and get away with it?
2007-01-26 06:22:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋