It seems to me that although we know that torturing the brother is a good idea, Jack doesn't. Has he just lost his mind, or is there some other evidence of his brother's complicity in a crime that Jack is aware of that I missed?
As of right now the evidence against the brother is:
1. Jack's father *might* have information about a person implicated in the nuclear weapon problem.
2. The brother has said that he doesn't know where the father is, and Jack doesn't believe him.
Surely there's more than that, right? What have I missed?
2007-01-26
05:00:43
·
4 answers
·
asked by
?
4
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Television