We all know its coming. Some time this year religious right wing zealots will blame the entire failed war effort in Iraq on democrats.
Im thinking that the blaming will start around 11/2007. what about you?
2007-01-26 03:34:19 · 16 answers · asked by capnofdaghetto 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they already are...it's clintons fault.
2007-01-26 03:38:29 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Oh, they will, although I don't know when. Some feel they are already laying the groundwork. It's going to be a tough sell though. The people aren't as dumb as they think--look at the last election. They have lost so much credibility that many of their own are not even on board with them anymore.
It will be interesting to see if traditional conservatives can take the party back from the fundies and the neo-cons. I expect the party to remain in disarray for some time.
2007-01-26 03:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by scott 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
(generally) Liberal Democrat I keep in mind while the US went into Afghanistan after 9/11 - few human beings questioned the reasoning... Bin encumbered became into there, and their government would not hand him over. All however the annoying-middle liberals supported the action. Then W mentioned "O.ok., now Iraq." ? very almost each reason he has given for it fairly is been shown fake or a minimum of very much exaggerated. As an after-theory, the ideal he could arise with became into "nicely, the Iraqi every physique is extra effective off without Sadam." this may well be genuine, even nonetheless it fairly is not a valid explanation for one trillion-dollar warfare or the inability of the yank provider adult adult males and girls. the ideal answer i can confirm IS to set a timetable - for the hot Iraqi government. they're those with the cost selection surplus now, and the main important (non-US) concern is the comparable previous Sunni/Shiite warfare that has been around constantly, and could proceed as quickly as we unavoidably bypass away... not our undertaking. we could kick the hot Iraqi government interior the decrease back-area and get them to start doing their activity, relatively of according to us to do it for them so we are able to hold our individuals residing house.
2016-12-12 20:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In case you missed it. someone on this site several days ago has already blamed Clinton and Carter. I'm not very smart but I am still trying to figure out how Carter is to blame. But I am certain that the repubs will lay the blame on anyone but Bush and the shooter. Also, in case you missed it, Chaney has told members of the press that they know nothing about how to run a war. This is from a guy who had more deferrments that carters got liver pills.
2007-01-26 03:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it may be sooner like in 6 months when the time for some progress is supposed to be. If the Dems can resist cutting funds till then I don't see how they can get blamed. Oh course cons will go back to Clinton or any other Dem - maybe even blame the Generals who disagree with Bush.
2007-01-26 03:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me the blaming has already begun.
The rightwingers lie all the time and say that most Democrats in Congress voted for the war.
Actually, 126 Democrats in the House and 21 Democrats in the Senate voted against the lie-based Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml
Only SIX REPUBLICANS in the House and ONE Republican in the Senate voted against the LIE-BASED QUAGMIRE.
So, the notion that Democrats SHARE RESPONSIBILITY because a MINORITY OF DEMOCRATS BELIEVED THE LIES ABOUT WMD, is patently RIDICULOUS.
2007-01-26 03:39:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you not understand that this is not a republican or a democrat thing but instead an American thing. The majority vote rules here and the majority voted to go to Iraq. If the majority of the people voting were Repubs (and they were) then we as the voting citizens put them there. You see where this is heading? If you don't agree with the way things a going use your vote wisely. Did the people you voted for vote in the nay column or did you fail to vote? If either of these are true then this is also your war. I take ownership of my part, I voted for someone who supported it.
2007-01-26 03:48:08 · answer #7 · answered by joevette 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They will blame the Democrats right before they blame the Generals, and if that fails they'll blame the troops.
2007-01-26 03:49:09 · answer #8 · answered by egg_zaktly 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You've missed the big picture . The only blame that Dems will get is for being short-sighted lily livered cowards . And that will come when the President's Plan DOES WORK . Watch and LISTEN to his words . I think he's setting-up the Dems for a BIG FALL . He's letting them go around ranting about how nothing will work and he's got an ace-up-his-sleeve about the new plan . Nothing else would make more sense .
2007-01-26 03:48:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Let's make a deal - we'll never even hint at blaming you for the war in Iraq, if you finally, 45 years after the fact, accept blame for our involvement in the war in Vietnam.
2007-01-26 03:42:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Nope
What is going to hit the blame is democrates do decide to pull out of Iraq before it is stable and terrorist camps are establish and we get another 9/11 scale attack or worse.
If that does happen before 08 you can kiss the DNC majority and any hopes of a DNC president.
2007-01-26 03:41:21 · answer #11 · answered by Max50 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋