believed in tolerance of other's religions.
And why is he trying to pass himself off as a Christian? Is he afraid that as a Muslim he will not be able to get the nomination??
You Dems crack me up with all your in-fighting then blame it all on the Republicans. Any half whitt with a decent connection to the internet can find the truth about it. Of course the Dem leadership doesn't give any credit to their supporters and assume you all are only quarter whitts.
2007-01-26 03:29:54 · 12 answers · asked by El Pistolero Negra 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She's not, stop listening to the lies being told by Limbaugh, Hannity and Fox news.
2007-01-26 03:35:42 · answer #1 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Over a million people have contributed to the Obama marketing campaign. 1000's of 1000's have contributed to Hillary's marketing campaign. If each and every doubtlessly contributor had to positioned up a life heritage and approach survey to be particular that they'd under no circumstances achieved some thing questionable or held unattractive attitudes it must be quite complicated to fund a marketing campaign. If having pals whose concepts you do not trust makes someone corrupt we are all both corrupt or socially remoted.
2016-10-16 03:30:57 · answer #2 · answered by sharona 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop getting all your news from FOX and right wing rags, Internet and papers. They are the ones who started that nonsense and all and any responsible news channels are lambasting them for it. Hillary's camp did NOT start that crap about Obama, and everyone but FOX news junkies and those who can't seem to read anything but right wing propaganda know that by now. Obama's "Muslim" past consists of attending Muslim (and Catholic) parochial schools from the ages of 6 to 10 when he lived in Jakarta with his Mom and Stepfather. It was the only good educational system available there and when he went to school back then they weren't teaching hatred of non-Muslims in Indonesia. He learned really revolutionary stuff like how to read and do math.
2007-01-26 05:21:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You've got it spot-on. I think politicians in general, but especially democrats, tend to fight and be malicious towards one another. I think it's pretty pathetic of Clinton to attack Obama's heritage. I hope the democrats get the presidency so I can ask what went wrong when they do the same crap as the republicans did.
Like Democrat rep. Gerry Studds who was actually caught in the act of having sex with (not inappropriate messages) a 17 year old male page in 1983. He refused to apologize, was censured, and then elected to five more terms before his retirement. You don't hear that brought up very often when the Foley story is being discussed or used against republicans.
2007-01-26 03:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by Saint 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I mean it is obvious to anyone but the Bush hating Liberals that Hilary is responsible for outing Obama's past...why don't Liberals ask this one important question.."What would the Republicans have to gain for outing him this soon into the election process?" The answer is nothing...now if this came about after he had "won" the Democrat nomination, then more than likely it would have been the Republicans...but who is Hilary's main competition? He better watch himself...people who get in Hilary and Bill's way have a strange habit of dying in unexplained and mysterious ways...
2007-01-26 03:48:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
This was long cleared up by the media. The whole thing was a job of attack machine's work coming from an outfit called "Insight"
It originated some lies then Glenn Beck and Fox New picked up and amplified, distorted and hope it will have the same effect of the swift boat success.
2007-01-26 03:50:56 · answer #6 · answered by Tia T 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I've mentioned this "in-fighting" before and got berated for it. I find it amusing how fervent people can be and look somewhat forward to being entertained the next several months.
2007-01-26 03:40:30 · answer #7 · answered by Wurm™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is not really a threat to Hillary. We all know he does not stand a chance. It is probably the Republicans starting all of this and blaming it on Hillary. She would not spend her time on such nonsense.
2007-01-26 03:54:06 · answer #8 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
As in every election the mud slinging starts early.
2007-01-26 04:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hillary's attack machine hasn't even begun to roll on Obama.
You will know when she gets it going.
Obama is toast if anything Clintons know how to do is smear someone if they are in their way.
2007-01-26 03:37:29 · answer #10 · answered by Max50 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋