Nodody ever stops to think if are they gleening from the same donor. Nobody ever stops to think that these kids will one day grow up and they may just be geting married to their own biological sibling. Never stop to think about the legalities of such a situtation and never stop to think that maybe some people should not have children and it is natural selction. This has become too much of an Orweillian society!
2007-01-26 01:33:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Aquasharp must be waaaAAAAaaaay out in left field up against the fence standing in water waaaAAAAAAAaaaay over his head with his pants down on the verge of be drowned.
His answer was rather Aqua dumb. There is actually a difference where a child is raised in a single parent (woman or man) home or one where both are present.
And, there is also a difference where there is a man and woman raising their child-children together and where the Father and Mother are a married couple, raising their children.
People do not want to hear what the Bible has to say.
But, God intended for children to be raised in a Husband and Wife relationship and that dear friend will never change.
A child needs both the mother and the father. Each one contributes to the well being of the child.
I know there are situations beyond our control and where the child has only one parent. But to start out in a sperm bank and being impregnated basically by a turkey baster type method is not what was intended.
The truth in the Bible, never changes.
When uneventful things happen, such as divorce, the death of a parent, etc. parents jobs changes, constantly moving, or even if your church splits and Half the congregation split.
The Children are always the main ones that suffer.
I just now read Phil #3's Answer.
I see he has 1 thumbs down. (Which I will cancel)
Why? Truth hurt?
I do not understand why someone would give the thumbs down. His answer is pretty much right on the money.
MWF, we were asked our opinion. not if women are capable. men are capable to. It is not the same as mother and father raising them together.
One more thing. You have 2 different women and sperm from the same donor, May never happen. <==== (alot have gotten in trouble because of that)., the children are born to different parents, makes no difference if there single ot married or what ever. These to children meet and fall for each other and wish to marry Don't know, Is that legal?
2007-01-26 13:36:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by smially 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well if the donor has problems like say diabetes it's going to suck for the kid because the kid might inherit that. And I think it's sad that some women would be so desperate for a baby that they'll go and get some strange guy to donate his sperm so they can get pregnant. As to how it affects society, well I'd have to guess that it either doesn't bother them or people look down on the women who do this.
2007-01-26 09:56:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
it's a woman's personal choice. As far as the affect on the kids, well kids are brought up in all sorts of different situations, a lot of them by single women, they cope. Society? Well same applies really, must be a tough choice for woman to intentionally take on single parenthood, it's tough enough bringing up kids with another parent there. Even though the nuclear family is considered to be "normal" it isn't actually the only model for sucessful child rearing, there are societies that function in other ways. As long children keep being born and reared and society maintains a reasonable degree of order, what difference does it make?
2007-01-26 13:23:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by gerrifriend 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
Well I'm quite the libertarian so I would say they can do so if they want. On the other hand the statistics show that single children with no present father are many times more likely to take drugs, commit crime, be depressed and fail in school.
I suppose if the children had good male rolemodels it would help, but nothing substitutes a father.
2007-01-26 13:21:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by callum828 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Normally I would say it's a great idea but I've met a woman who had a baby girl this way and wants to have another child and she's a nutcase. Like, I would guess you have to pass some kind of profile to do it. Maybe not, no one else seems to need a license to have kids do they? This woman is scary crazy. Her daughter is six now and really messed up. She scares me too. I wonder if she'll end up a sociopath. I avoid them like the plague. The woman seems almost like a paranoid schizophrenic to me and she has the money to go ahead and get inseminated again.
2007-01-26 10:19:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by willow78 1
·
6⤊
1⤋
Being a single parent is not the same as being an ONLY parent. (Even a child with a deceased parent has a legacy and other family to root to.)
A few issues (questions) face all of these children:
What is so wrong with my mother that she couldn't get married or at the very least conceive me the normal way?
Why did NO ONE want her? Will that happen to me? (Especially for girls.)
I want to at least KNOW who my father is. Why did my mother chose to put me in this situation? Who are my grandparents, cousins, siblings on my father's side?
If there is a father somewhere, that is better than this situation, unless he is very abusive.
2007-01-26 14:48:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Carl 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Wow... I am amazed at how many people don't think that women are capable of raising children on their own...although women are doing it everyday, and often it's not by choice.
Feminists are not the ones saying single parenting does not negatively affect the children, research is saying this. Feminists are only trying to bring it to light to the ignorant people who think that by virtue of having a father a child is going to grow up healthy.
I understand the concerns about health issues, but would a married couple choose not to have children because the father had diabetes? I doubt it.
When statistics find problems with children in fatherless homes, poverty is almost always the underlying factor. If these women are going to the effort of being inseminated, it is likely that they have thought their decision through and have decided that they can financially and emotionally support a child on their own.
2007-01-26 10:57:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by FWM 3
·
7⤊
4⤋
I think it's a bad idea, especially if the donor wants nothing to do with the child afterwards, which is usually the case. The child will grow up not ever knowing its biological father, and that can create a huge void in a person.
2007-01-26 09:53:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
I should not be shocked by all the ignorant ridiculous people answering this question. Yet i am, I can;t say it any better then the lady who is also shocked at all the responses so far.
You people are what is wrong with this society, not us.
2007-01-26 11:20:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
2⤋