English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Must be an example of a high crime or misdemeanor.

2007-01-26 01:12:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Rita Tarder; these are not proven, let alone impeachable.

2007-01-26 01:23:38 · update #1

9 answers

NONE. WHETHER I LIKE HIM OR NOT. ONE MUST BE ABLE TO SHOW THE FACTS AND ANY PROOF TO SHOW IF THERE WERE ANY OFFENSES THAT CAN BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES. IF YOU CANNOT THEN YOU ARE JUST GUESSING OR GOING BY YOUR EMOTIONS

2007-01-26 02:11:16 · answer #1 · answered by cowboybronco01 4 · 0 1

Well, if people can get themselves into a lather over Clinton's lying about a BJ - something most normal people engage in - I cannot see how they could write a pass for Bush and secret prisons.

It is now a matter of record. The CIA has clearly testified: Bush himself signed an order directing the CIA to set up secret prisons around the world.

Two and a half years ago, the ACLU submitted an FOIA request to the CIA seeking seventy different records relating to the torture policies of the Bush Administration.

By authorizing the kidnapping, disappearing, and perhaps even the torturing of detainees, Bush was violating the Geneva Conventions and the Treaty Against Torture.

So how does one weigh subterfuge like this against a BJ, which millions of married men have lied about?

It blows my mind.

But....at this point in history, I just want the cracker to finish his term and hopefully not cause any more major damage.

Let us hope and pray that his successor is an improvement in integrity, intelligence, statesmanship and - lol - public speaking.

2007-01-26 09:31:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Nothing. While he has not been a great (or even good for that matter) president, he has not done anything even remotely close to being an impeachable offense.

2007-01-26 09:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The main ones are:

#1. Illegal wire tapping of American citizens without a court order.

#2. Lying about weapons of mass destruction, AFTER the reports came back saying they was no threat.

2007-01-26 09:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

running for president

2007-01-26 09:17:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

ran for president

2007-01-26 09:16:17 · answer #6 · answered by elite_women_rule_the_rock 6 · 1 2

being born

2007-01-26 09:15:50 · answer #7 · answered by natalia 4 · 2 2

None at all.

2007-01-26 09:23:35 · answer #8 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1 2

he hasn't; he's just a dummy.

2007-01-26 09:17:35 · answer #9 · answered by Joni J 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers