Pray Tell, If there are WMD's in Iraq or in the hands of Terrorists why?

Question

have they not used them to gain advantage and force the occupiers off their lands and region....

or at least used it in a third country where there is a preponderance of American and UK troops.? WHY?

avhac, I don't deny the existence of such weapons or attempts by rouge Russians to sell them... I do object to killing 650,000 people and over 4500 coalition troops in Iraq when they never had or could have had WMD's

Ruth... come,come... we shouldn't have been over there in the first place. How many Iraqi's are killed daily and some not even accounted for.

THORGIRLS... I have NEVER reported anyone on these boards. I find that sort of action reprehensible because I believe in freedom of expression. You can rest assured that if you were reported it was not me and I do take exception to the accusation. I did try to email you directly but noted that you do not allow that facility.

Answer 1

After saying we are coming (the UN) for 3 years... I could have dragged the Nimitz out by myself and hid it! Please everyone in cluding all your heroes (the clintons, the Democrats the UN and the French) all said they were there. stop with the lies and please stop reporting me it gets old and shows your true colors....

If I made that in error I apologize..... As a female in uniform I do not need the emails from Men, Liberals, Muslim extremists and France!

Answer 2

Your question poses something that is obvious to everyone except the most ardent and credulous of Bush supporters. Common sense tells you that if an enemy has a tactical advantage over an adversary, and there is no politically correct or morally sensitive body that governs the actions of the enemy and prevents them from using certain tactics, than that enemy will naturally employ their advantage, regardless of how dastardly or heinous that advantage would be.

If I am physically stronger than my opponent, then when I get into a fistfight with him, naturally I will employ my superior strength to win the altercation. If I am faster than my adversary than I will utilize my quickness to defeat him. Similarly, if terrorists truly had WMDs or biological weapons, they would have applied them in the defeat of coalition forces in Iraq.

Its obvious that Al Qaeda and all the other terrorist cells out there, while dangerous organizations that need to be stopped, are no where as capable of the carnage as Bush and his fear mongering associates would like us to believe, and that the way to stop them is not through conventional military invasions.

Will your question fall on deaf ears among Bush’s supporters? Yes. Why Bush supporters aren’t receptive to something that is just common sense and rational is because they are not thinking rationally. They are, to use the words of comedian Stephen Colbert, thinking with their gut instead of their head. As you and I know, many times gut instincts can be dead wrong.

Answer 3

If they knew anymore about where to find them than we do they would use them. Most of the weapons we are talking about are indiscriminate killers they would kill the combatants as well as those the are attacking. Chemical weapons kill every one in the area.

The whole world believed before hand he had the weapons.

Any that might have known where the weapons are or were are dead. Trust that they will turn up and don't be surprised if it is in California and we are the victims.

Answer 4

Good question and good pt; but, the argument is unneccessary.

It is better to fight the uneducated, misinformed with education of facts rather than logic.

Watch this Frontline series.. about 1.5 hours. Take notes and you will be armed with the facts behind no WMDs in Iraq, Bush knowingly lieing to Congress and the American ppl and will be able to defend your argument.

Btw, Frontline practically every year wins the truth in journalism award.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/

Answer 5

I enjoy your statement. There were no WMD's in Iraq. Bush only used this ploy to get what he wanted by conning the US Congress and the American people. I believe you are right when you state if there were WMD's, then the terrorists/insurgents would have utilized them by now against occupying forces in Iraq, or within the Middle East itself. It also holds credence to say radical elements within Israel would have used them instead of crude IED-type devices.

Answer 6

"Pray Tell, If there are WMD's in Iraq or in the hands of Terrorists why? have they not used them to gain advantage and force the occupiers off their lands and region...."

It's just another example of their diabolical evil. They have stock-piles of WMDs, see... but they don't actually use them, see... because they want us to be really confused and disoriented, they think we'll start developing nervous conditions, cluster head-aches, that kind of thing.

Diabolical I tell ya!

Answer 7

since you preech "truth" i decided to feed you your breakfast.

What are your thoughts on this?
Russia Silent on Georgian Uranium Sting
Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:29 PM EST
The Associated Press
By HENRY MEYER

MOSCOW (AP) — Russia responded with silence Thursday after Georgia revealed a foiled effort by a Russian man to sell weapons-grade uranium, an episode that appeared to cast doubt on the nation's ability to halt the black market trade in nuclear materials.