No, the entire election is based on Electoral Vote. Electoral Vote is based on on popular vote, by state. Politicians are awarded points for each state they win.
2007-01-26 00:35:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
No. The electoral system *intentionally* does not represent the popular vote.
The purpose is to prevent the candidates from courting the high-density population areas (like cities and populous states), and ignoring the effectively insignificant low-population areas and states.
The system encourages the candidate to have a broad range of appeal to a variety of states and regions.
Certainly this system can still be min-maxed to get the most bang for the buck. This is why you see both parties focus on certain swing states and ignore large populous states at times. There are even board games that specifically emulate this process and provide an even greater insight into this process.
Check out the referenced wiki article for details on how many of the states determine their electors, and a detailed explanation of the entire process and its basis in the constitution and the amendments. It also has the specific examples and numbers that you asked about.
2007-01-26 02:21:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lem 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
accepted vote, in a run-off election like France does if no candidate wins a majority of the accepted vote after the first election. In a properly-loved vote election, your vote would honestly count number and be equivalent in all 51 electoral aspects. i'm effective the human beings of u . s . a . are honestly sensible sufficient to contained in the present day pick their president after 2 hundred plus years. Territories might want to wish to be allowed to vote for the President besides, they have that strong in France besides, which has a Semi-Presidental gadget. the concept of a properly-loved vote develop into heavily entertained after an election Nixon received in 1968. He had .a million% more advantageous accepted vote yet had 301 EVs over 191(Humphrey) and 40 six (Wallace, a southern protest vote with the help of the electors). Electoral college protects the rights of the small states and that is the position the synthetic considered its fall. It exceeded Congress as well the incontrovertible actuality that it died interior the smaller states. So both each and every and each and every of the States adjust to three type of electoral college reform or settle on for accepted vote or human beings settle in this count number in a Referendum.
2016-12-03 01:54:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
your dad must be pretty dumb if he thinks that. everyone should have learned from the 2000 election that the electoral vote isn't the same as the popular vote:
presidential election of 2000 was one of the most controversial and closest presidential elections in the history of the United States. It was a contest between Democratic candidate Al Gore, the Vice President of the United States, and Republican candidate George W. Bush, the Governor of Texas. The election was held on November 7, 2000.
On election night, the news media twice declared a winner in the state of Florida prematurely based on exit polls,[1] before deciding the race was too close to call. It became clear that both candidates needed Florida's electoral votes to win the presidency. A month of controversial court challenges and recounts followed, until the Supreme Court of the United States halted further recounts in its ruling for Bush v. Gore. Bush was certified as the winner in Florida by a margin of 537 votes, thereby defeating Gore, who received more votes than Bush nationwide. It was the third time in American history that a candidate won the vote in the Electoral College without receiving a plurality of the popular vote. (This also happened in the elections of 1876 and 1888.)
2007-01-26 00:59:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lane 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
The Electoral College only shows how the Founding Fathers did not trust the American electorate. Instead of directly voting for your president, you send delegates, from your state, who vote for the president. In our modern time, however, it is unforeseeable to have those delegates cast their vote for anyone besides the candidate who won the popular vote in their state, except maybe Florida.
2007-01-26 01:01:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jackson Leslie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
My advise is use your Yahoo search engines under(electoral college voting process in the United States).
2007-01-26 00:44:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by jamesanderson22 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO! That is why it is SO important to vote for the right electoral canidate in the August elections. Don't forget to Vote!!!
2007-01-26 00:40:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by dar 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
not always...because of the electorial college...america is not a "true" democracy
2007-01-26 00:37:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael K 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
this is a sham in America.
2007-01-26 00:38:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eric the Great *USA* 4
·
0⤊
2⤋