Pro-choice/Pro- life is comparing apples to oranges. Pro-choice is simply a term that the N.O.W. uses to trick unsuspecting people. Most americans would give everyone the right to choose most things but when it comes to abortion, the proper terms would be pro-life/pro-death. Using these terms, most people would choose pro-life. How can anyone wish death on someone and support the killing of innocent children. A child has no right to life? Intentional killing has no place in civilized society. Another argument regarding rape and incest, its a tough one, but if this were the only legal way to have an abortion, the incidents of rape and incest in this country would skyrocket. This is similar to many of our current problems wheras we ignore it now and deal with it later. If Roe v Wade had been vigorously prosecuted, millions of babies would not have been sacrificed. This is simply the way I feel, and hopefully someone out their might understand the "other side.
2007-01-26 00:24:58 · 3 answers · asked by americanmalearlington 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
As soon as a baby is fertalised it has the right to live and it is considered as a human being. Every child is different and every child that is in a mothers tummy has the right to life. The arguments against that for people for abortion would be !. You can abort a child if it has a gentic illness, but that is totally wrong because the child in the endrun is still a human being and it deserves are respect no matter. 2. If the parents are too young to have the baby. My argument for that is that they shouldn't have had sex in the first place if they think that. 3. They may not be able to support the child growing up. My argument to that is their are plenty of societies and companies that offer money to fincially problematic families and couples when they are about to have a child. 4. They would rather buy the latest BMW than have the child. Well that is selfish if they are choosing to buy a car over a human childs life. All people in aid of abortion, deserve to be severly punnished. I am disgraced that London is known for the biggest abortion centre in the world.
2007-01-26 00:40:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anna S 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To me the only viable reason would be incest, because with rape there are morning after pills readily available. Period. And 93% of abortions are done out of convenience, so that means that 7% are done in rape & incest cases and in hopes of "saving" the mothers life. To me that is not enough to justify the killing of millions upon millions of innocent babies.
2007-01-26 08:38:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is termed pro-life/pro-choice because not every person who supports the right to an abortion would choose abortion for themselves - as a matter of fact, there are many "pro-choicers" - myself included, who couldn't conceive of a situation in which they would have an abortion.
From the women I have known who have had abortions, not one of them did it for "convenience," not one of them did it because it was the choice they wished to make - they did it because it was a choice someone else made for them or it was medically necessary (someone who had a serious illness during pregnancy and would have had major complications in delivering the baby had she carried it to term, not to mention known birth defects resulting from her illness).
2007-01-26 09:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by JenV 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋